It is important first to distinguish any analysis of social justice in Australia (and indeed elsewhere) by distinguishing two levels of social justice.

Firstly by identifying the circumstances where each is a possibility. Absolute justice, which is a highly theoretical (abstract) level of achievement, is not possible in practical everyday settings, because of the limitations of the human condition. This is due, to factors stemming from imperfect information (or other factors such as those required for human accomplishment, including personal development) - and the inadequate range and appropriateness of management and leadership skills available to individuals and organisations at present and for the foreseeable future. In these circumstances therefore, when problems of justice are analysed, it appears appropriate to distinguish then between absolute (a theoretical or academic concern) and relative justice (normally referred to as a fair go) but recognised as a form of imperfect justice.

It would therefore be appropriate to observe the activities used, to improve social justice in a country such as a Australia, especially through development of appropriate government policy and monitoring of justice concerns (aspects therefore of relative justice known), rather than the highly desirable (and theoretical) but not realisable concerns of absolute justice.

Consequently the object of individuals, organisations and groups should therefore be to optimise solutions in such a manner, achieving a just outcome wherein what is accepted as a solution, at least for the time being is done so by accepting a less than perfect outcome, which recognises constraints, and development paths which cannot be altered for some time. It is consequently well known, therefore (and consistent with the expectations outlined above) that the available established channels to justice to an individual or society wide in Australia is often too restrictive.

This has often been observed in a variety of facets of Australian life, especially the legal profession. Consequently the formal legal process in our society (especially court processes and conveyancing - which can embrace judicial review of statutes and resolution of conflict between aspects of legislation, the interpretation of the common law and - and the future requirements that might stem from the emergence of a Bill of Rights - has meant that the current Australian legal process is very red tape oriented and the

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• next page >>

---

Add your voice

Know something about Social justice in Australia?
We want to hear your view. Write now!