2 of 6

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 4

no oversight. As long as they turn in their homework, show up in class and act like they are participating they will pass. This does not work in school and it should not work in the professional environment.

What cannot be identified by this industry is which category their member falls into, the institution does not address "strategy" complaints so a "diligent", researched and supported metric of strategy successes, failures or a minimum of customer satisfaction is not maintained. I include customer satisfaction as part of this metric because when one hires counsel one should not be exposed to verbal abuse, such as calling the client "stupid", that is the reason that they were retained to represent the client. Based upon the omission of the performance/service metric claims of "diligent" members are without foundation. A niche is provided for predatory profiteering without consequences. The public is expected to "trust" that when they hire an attorney they will have competent representation, this is based upon Bar's unsupported claims of a "diligent" membership. In this manner the Virginia State Bar facilitates fraud.

If the Bar was concerned about the integrity of the profession they would accept "strategy" complaints and research the foundation of the complaints. Individuals that complain for the sake of complaining would be weeded out. Members that took the hard cases and the outcomes were not what the client believed would be identified - a good attorney that does not shirk a tough job. Members that make an occasional "mistake" would be added to their stats. A member that makes frequent mistakes such that this metric would identify a trend, a client would not want counsel that habitually makes mistakes. Lastly members that had developed a practice of processing their clients would be identified and could be sanctioned by the institution. This is not done by the Bar, by its implementation the Bar's sole goal is to enable a crony network of predators that prey upon wounded individuals. All cases can be questioned because of this lack of diligence by the institution, was an individual found guilty because their attorney did not bother to present material to the courts ? The courts do not know, the Bar does not know, only the client and the attorney know. If the client had an issue, could not afford to buy the law, but made a complaint and it was dismissed as strategy by the institution then the practice is facilitated.
-
This is based upon our experiences documented

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about What do you do when the legal system fails you?
We want to hear your view. Write now!