2 of 15

No

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 2

- place on the political spectrum from conservative to liberal
- foreign policy
- trade doctrines
- fiscal, economic background
- military stance
- level of diplomatic expertise
- views towards personal rights and freedoms

And so on - unfortunately, the candidates have to tread lightly as to their real beliefs so as to not alienate as many public interest groups as possible. While a Republican will have to be aligned with Pro-Life, anti-abortion causes and support religious fundamentalists and evangelists, a Democrat will still have to at least espouse "Christian" beliefs and work cautiously around being Pro-Choice.

In any event, the biases against an atheist being elected are extreme, even though most of our founding fathers - Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and others were of the Age of Reason, founded the United States as a secular government and were more deists than ascribing to any specific religion.

To consider and accept a candidate, even in the smallest part, based on their views on esoteric concepts that no one honestly can say they know for sure to be certain is the height of insanity, yet is unfortunately and increasingly part of every day political life in America. The only way to oppose this is to challenge religion in all its forms:

- Why are religious groups given the benefit of tax-free status when they contribute no real, tangible benefit to the economy?
- Why must a candidate's religious beliefs be a matter of public record if our country is truly an example of separation of church and state?
- Why can a candidate not be an atheist?
- Why are religious groups allowed to participate in an allegedly secular process?

The other aspect of religion that needs to be de-mystified and challenged is that all must and should respect one's "religious beliefs." We should not be afraid to challenge any and all beliefs, especially irrational ones and such that have led to cult suicides (Jim Jones - Guyana), exploitation of wealthy and shallow Hollywood actors (Scientology), killings under "God's command" (See "Under the Banner of Heaven," Jon Krakauer) and worldwide divisiveness and disaster (Christianity vs. Islam).

To allow these concepts to enter into our political process at all, let alone into choosing our Presidents, is a matter of shame and ignorance for all Americans. At a minimum, stemming the tide of the influence of religious organizations in the political process is a worthwhile if lofty goal, winnings hearts to use their minds in electing candidates.

Learn more about this author, Pete Smits.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

• << previous page
• 1
• 2

Add your voice

Know something about Should religion play an important role in choosing presidential candidates??
We want to hear your view. Write now!