Where Knowledge Rules

Politics, News & Issues:

US Law & Justice

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Do mandatory seat belt laws violate individual rights?

Results so far:

Yes
45% 395 votes Total: 877 votes
No
55% 482 votes

Seat belt laws only violate the individual rights of people that lack the intelligence to make rational decisions for their own safety. For those that have the capacity to make those rational decisions, seat belt laws are just redundancies. Statistics have shown that wearing a seat belt will, more often than not, save a person's life if they get in an accident.

Anti-seat belt proponents will often quote obscure stories of people dying because they wore a seat belt, but conveniently forget all of the stories where a seat belt saved a life. Everyone has stories, there are stories where drunk drivers survive accidents, does that mean everyone should drink and drive? NO! It is flawed logic to base one's decisions on isolated stories. Statistics clearly show that drinking and driving is dangerous, and they also clearly show that riding in a vehicle without a seat belt is dangerous.

Statistics also show that a majority of people are injured or killed while wearing clothes. Based on the same sort of flawed logic that anti-seat belt proponents eschew, we should come to the conclusion that wearing clothes is dangerous and people should not do so. Any rational intelligent being can realize, though, that there is no correlation here.

In 2002, 10,984 people were killed in car accidents in the United States, 5,226 were injured. In those accidents, 10,404 were not wearing seat belts, and 5,806 were. Take a look at those numbers for a minute? Do you see a correlation there? The number of people killed and the number of people not wearing seat belts is nearly identical. Also, the number of those just injured nearly matches those wearing seat belts. Certainly there are exceptions, which is why the numbers are not exact, but it is obvious that wearing a seat belt greatly increases the chances of surviving an accident.

Wearing a seat belt also affords a certain amount of greater control over a vehicle. With a well fitting seat belt in place, a driver is more firmly seated in the driver's seat, which leads to less sliding around and a greater feeling of oneness with the vehicle. Ask any race car driver if they were guaranteed to not be injured or die in a car wreck if they would still wear a harness, and they would tell you "Yes" because being strapped into the vehicle affords greater control and precision when driving.

Are your individual rights taken away with seat belt laws? Only if you want to have the right to a greater chance of death in an accident. For everyone else, they keep those that want to die from causing higher taxes due to the city having to clean up and dispose of the bodies of those that do not wear seat belts.

Learn more about this author, David Bowie.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Do mandatory seat belt laws violate individual rights?

No
  • 1 of 33

    by Sandra Piddock

    Here in England, as we endure the seemingly never-ending inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, one thing has

    read more

  • 2 of 33

    by Alan Fernald

    There is no way to constitutionally justify mandatory seat belt laws. However, these same mandatory seat belt laws do not

    read more

Yes

Add your voice

Know something about Do mandatory seat belt laws violate individual rights??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

173917

Featured Partner

Takes All Types

Takes All Types has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Takes All Types' f...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA