Channel Button

There are 676 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #31 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Government & Policies

Get a Widget for this title

Should smoking be allowed in public places?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

Yes
39% 2214 votes Total: 5688 votes
No
61% 3474 votes

that so called air-rage incidents must have at least in some cases something to do with allowing people lots of booze while banning them from a cigarette.
I think that total ban on smoking on many (even uncovered) rail platforms and in some airports is completely unjustified by any arguments of inconveniencing non-smokers.

The fourth group of places are what most of the arguments are now about: clubs, pubs and restaurants. I do believe that cigarettes are very much a part of going-out script for many people and integral element in the process of getting generally wasted (drunk, stoned, high, deafened by loud music, laid) that comprises a good night out (OK, not any more for me but I have fond memories). Clubs and pubs should decide for themselves if they are going to ban or partially ban smoking: there is absolutely no compulsion of visiting these places and I really do think that people should be allowed to vote with their feet: those who are concerned about smoking will simply stay out of a smoking venue. I know that there is concern about effects of passive smoking on staff employed in such establishments, but if the link between passive smoking and long-term health risks is ever conclusively proven, smoking pubs and clubs could be treated as 'hazardous areas' and non-smokers employed in such would be paid more, a bit like workers with hazardous or radioactive chemicals are, I believe.

Restaurants are a harder case in my opinion as tobacco and food are not nowadays culturally linked as closely as tobacco and booze. I would suggest smoking and non-smoking rooms where possible while if not a choice left to the restaurant (smoking or non-smoking).

And finally, I can't see any reasons whatsoever for banning smoking outside in open public spaces like parks or streets.

*

For those interested in my personal relation to smoking; I don't smoke now, until 2 years ago I used to smoke daily for about 15 years, I come from a non-smoking family but all the guests were allowed to smoke inside unless there was a baby in the room.

169725_m Learn more about this author, Magda Healey.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should smoking be allowed in public places?

Yes
  • 1 of 313

    by Peta S. Cameron

    Allowing smoking in public places may bring confusion for many people, especially for those who have never actually been

    read more

  • by Allen Williams

    One of the prime crops and economic powers of this country was and is tobacco. George Washington had thousands of acres growing

    read more

No
  • 1 of 363

    by Jeremy Fisher

    "They've taken away our freedom," was the first complaint that I heard as a result of England's public smoking ban. And so

    read more

  • 2 of 363

    by Susan Huizinga

    FREEDOM TO BREATHE!

    I have smoked for years, and I say ABSOLUTELY NOT.

    Waving a gun around in a public place is illegal. Driving

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should smoking be allowed in public places??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

104405

Featured Partner

Universal Giving

Universal Giving is a social entrepreneurship nonprofit whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteeri...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA