There are 34 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #21 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| No | 21% | 107 votes | Total: 504 votes | |
| Yes | 79% | 397 votes |
I believe that smokers should bear the responsibility for the health risks of cigarette smoking. This subject needs to be split up into two different eras.
First, we have the cigarette smokers of long ago. They did not really know the health risks of cigarette smoking and they really can't be expected to be responsible for risks that they did not know.
I am referring to smokers who got cancer from cigarettes and then found out in the 90s that cigarettes cause cancer. These people really did not know what they were getting into when they began smoking and did so for decades. They deserve compensation from the tobacco companies who withheld information, and, even if they did not know, they should still be responsible for compensating smokers whose health is damaged by their product.
In this case, I believe that the tobacco companies bear the sole responsibility of causing cancer in thousands of people. The smokers are innocent.
Secondly, we have the modern smokers. They know about all of the health risks of cigarette smoking and they really need to be responsible for their own actions. They know what cigarettes do, if they continued to smoke. This is the dumbest irony in humans - to continue to do things in the face of the truth.
People know that cigarettes cause cancer, so they have the proper knowledge to make an informed decision and stop smoking. If they continue to smoke, even though they know the risks involved, then it should be their responsibility to not smoke. When they get cancer, it is their own fault and they should be majorly held responsible for any adverse effects they received from cigarette smoking.
In a few of my articles about smoking, I said that the government knows that cigarettes are dangerous to our health but they continue to allow cigarettes to be sold. They try to make themselves look proactive by charging smokers higher taxes in an effort to appear like they are really trying to decrease the number of smokers.
Instead of collecting higher taxes, I think that the government should either stop selling cigarettes completely or cut cigarette taxes and allow the ignorant people to bear the brunt of any health conditions that they receive as result of smoking. If they want to smoke and get cancer in the face of knowledge, then they should be allowed to.
If smokers with the knowledge that cigarettes cause cancer actually get cancer, they should be responsible for all of the medical bills associated with it. They should not be allowed to sue the tobacco companies like they have been and probably always will. They are adults and should be able to make responsible and intelligent decisions about products that can harm them.
Learn more about this author, John Gugie.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Leann Zotis
If tobacco were a product being imported from Colombia or some other South American country, it would have been banne...read more
by Candy Jules
A friend of mine told me a while back, "If I had known that I was going to live this long, I would have taken better ...read more
by Dave Simmons
Quite frankly, no. Let's start by defining why anyone would say 'yes'. Firstly, the idea is that smoking is a cons...read more
Smokers are no more responsible for assuming their own health care risks than are the obese who suffer strokes, or ta...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Should smokers bear the responsibility for the health risks of cigarette smoking??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA)
The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause....more
hide