Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Justice System
Created on: April 01, 2008
Three years ago, I was unfortunate enough to get to see our legal system in action in a child sex abuse case. I was, prior to that, fairly uneducated on how the system worked...or failed to work. I had many things explained to me over the course of the investigation and trial that I needed to become educated on, whether I wanted to or not.
One of these things was the issue of mandatory sentencing in my state. This is a set of guidelines that disallows jurors and judges from deciding what punishment serves the crime. In theory, this is a great idea. Jurors are not required to incorporate their "emotional response" to particular defendants. It is just a matter of deciding if he or she is guilty or not.
The guidelines apply to 21 particular crimes, sexual abuse being one of these. It applies to offenders who are 15 years of age and older. These sentencing guidelines have brought longer sentences with no time off for "good behavior." No probation, no parole, no early release. The initial reasoning for putting this set of standards in place was to keep criminals off the streets longer. I don't think there are many people who would argue that logic.
The sentencing is strict and harsh for violent crimes against society. This I do not disagree with. My problem lies in the fact that jurors are aware of these guidelines, yet are expected to pass judgment as if they are not. They are instructed to not consider the possible penalty as they deliberate and hand down their verdict. Is this really possible? It may be for a few of us, but I think that for the vast majority, it is not. We are people with emotions and at times, it is difficult to force reason to take precedence over those feelings.
When we are looking at an obviously crazy "Charles Manson" type, it may not be so difficult. When we are looking at a case with solid evidence, it probably won't be difficult at all. However, in crimes like in-family sex abuse, the offender may not look crazy and there may be no eyewitness. Unless there was intercourse and disclosure was made immediately, there will be no DNA. So, what are we left with? A child, possibly one who has had some behavior problems resulting from the mistreatment. A family, again one who may have some issues going on. The grooming process will not leave them untouched or unchanged.
In our case, we had those issues, but it went a step further than that. We also had a defendant we will call Darren. Darren is not the sort of man that everyone would see and think
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Deciding on more severe punishments for sex offenders and child abusers
by Kate O'Leary
When you combine a sex offender with a child abuser, you end up with a pedophile and there are really only two options for
We have become a country of "Vengeance." The Bible states, "Avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath: for
Three years ago, I was unfortunate enough to get to see our legal system in action in a child sex abuse case. I was, prior
The often cited obstacles to implement tougher sentencing guidelines and permanent supervision are lack of man power and
by Sam Caramela
Please tell me folks, when we are going to get tough on sex offenders in this country? Every night I turn on the TV and
View All Articles on: Deciding on more severe punishments for sex offenders and child abusers
Featured Partner
Founded in January 2006, the mission of the Sunlight Foundation is to strengthen the relationship between lawmakers and their constituents by maximizing transparency of the work of Congress, its members, staff and lobbyists. Sunlight bel...more