seems to assume that gay people can't fall in love; that their reasons for wanting to get married are somehow "wrong" or "impure" as opposed to the reasons straight people get married. Can we reflect for a moment on some of the reasons straight people do get married? Getting knocked up, money, a need to not be alone, 'it's just what you do', etc, etc. Enough said. As for "destroying the institution of marriage", let's be realistic - the "institution of marriage" is already quite dead and has been for quite some time. No one's going to be able to destroy something that's already been abused, shattered and soiled by the very people that are crying to protect its sanctity.
The Concerned Women of America is yet another group of people hiding behind the gripe that letting gays be gay is corrupting America and that letting them marry would be the end of all good and moral things as we know them. From their website: "When marriage is undermined, entire communities suffer. Fagan notes that broken households increase the risk for children of:
* health problems;
* retarded cognitive, especially verbal, development;
* low educational attainment;
* behavior problems;
* low impulse control;
* warped social development;
* physical and sexual abuse;
* crime in the local community.
The breakdown in marriage even leads to shorter lives. A study in the American Journal of Sociology found that "for both sexes, the hazard of dying falls significantly with marital duration, suggesting a cumulation (sic) of the benefits of marriage over time."
Now, while every statistic listed above is undoubtedly true (or halfway believable, at least), those statistics have nothing to do with "gay" marriages. They are statistics taken about marriage as it stands today in heterosexual households. Letting gay people get married does not undermine marriage they sure can't mess up the tradition as badly as we have.
As a conclusion, the "concerned women", state, "The stakes are very high: Absent a marriage-based culture, can America continue to function as a self-governing republic? History indicates that the chances are slim."
First of all, we're not self-governing. If you believe that your freedom is really free, you need to wake up. If we were really free, people in government wouldn't have the right to tell you who you can and cannot love, have sex with, and be joined with. Besides, we aren't even a marriage-based culture anymore, we're a divorce-based culture, and adultery-based culture, an abuse-based culture we're attacking the simple fact that gay people want to have sex and be married by saying that it will increase the violence in our homes and communities, that it will ruin our morals and corrupt our children when in fact, the main problem with violence and immorality in our lives is because we refuse to take responsibility for our own actions.
Learn more about this author, Shanna Riley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Amanda Fox
Marriage whether it be gay or straight is not something which anyone should need to make a case for, yet reality tells us
by B. L. Babb
Our founding fathers started this country for many reasons; to avoid religious persecution, escape from the general tyranny
by Kate Willis
About same-sex marriage.
I have been thinking about this for awhile and have been debating with many people on online forums
Most will remember George W. Bush's ban-gay-marriage charade, in 2006; he called for the amendment of our Constitution to
by Evil Mammoth
"We are confronted primarily with a moral issue... whether all Americans are to be afforded equal rights and equal opportunities,
View All Articles on:
The case for gay marriage
Add your voice
Know something about The case for gay marriage?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Universal Giving is a social entrepreneurship nonprofit whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteeri...more
hide