Where Knowledge Rules

Personal Finance:

Insurance

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Should government pay for all medical care?

Results so far:

Yes
53% 386 votes Total: 729 votes
No
47% 343 votes

No, the government should not pay for all medical care for every person in a nation. They certainly should ensure that everybody has access to essential and good quality health care - and that nobody is excluded due to their personal circumstances. However, there are many people who are able to contribute significantly to their own medical costs - and as such, they should be taking at least a certain degree of responsibility for it.

Without the majority of people in a society bearing a reasonable portion of their health expenses, the system cannot work long-term and ultimately nobody's best interests will be served. Most particularly, those who are most vulnerable of all will suffer. Of course, that is also the case when the government does not take enough responsibility for the health care of its citizens - and even ignores them altogether when they are in dire need. So there should be a balance, with those who are able to afford private health insurance being required to cover themselves up to a point.

Here in Australia we have had a Medicare system in place for many years now. Its goal is to provide good quality basic health care for every citizen. This means that everybody has access to public hospital care without having to meet any expenses from their own health insurance. It also means that every citizen is subsidized for the cost of consultations with a general practitioner or specialist. Some other health care is included as well. Some examples are: consultations with an optometrist; tests and examinations required by doctors in their treatment of an illness (including x-rays and pathology tests); and most surgical and other therapeutic procedures performed by doctors outside of the hospital system. Many pharmaceutical prescriptions are also subsidized by the government's Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

All of this applies to the general population. For those who are on very limited incomes - such as those on pensions of various kinds - there are other health expenses met by Medicare as well. These services are not covered for others. They include ambulance services, dental examinations and treatment, home nursing and provision of basic glasses, hearing aids, etc. To receive these extra benefits a person must qualify for a Health Care Card, according to their income status and other criteria.

There is also extra subsidization of families and individuals who are in a position where they have to spend an excessive amount of money on services provided by


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should government pay for all medical care?

No
  • 1 of 31

    by Ruth Woodhouse

    No, the government should not pay for all medical care for every person in a nation. They certainly should ensure that everybody

    read more

  • 2 of 31

    by David B Hitchcock

    Should government pay for all medical care?

    The short answer is no. The long answer is that the government should provide

    read more

Yes
  • 1 of 24

    by Garrett Anderson

    If in fact we value human life, as we say we do, answering this question is a "no-brainer." It is incredibly sad to see

    read more

  • 2 of 24

    by Joanna S Kelley

    The government should absolutely pay for medical care. If it did, the after-effects would be surprising:

    1) Less fraud. Medical

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should government pay for all medical care??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

138645

Featured Partner

OneWorld

OneWorld United States publishes US and international perspectives on global issues gathered from OneWorld partners w...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA