There are 160 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #20 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 41% | 524 votes | Total: 1281 votes | |
| No | 59% | 757 votes |
Is the threat of any punishment an effective crime deterrent? With the rising crime rate one would argue it is not, but the truth lies in the hidden statistics that will never be measured. How can you measure something that has not happened? Have you ever wanted to kill someone only to stop and think, "Oh, I hadn't better because of the death penalty!" I doubt it.
Measuring the number of people who did not commit a crime in which the death penalty was the punishment solely based on the punishment is next to impossible. So many other factors come into play when looking at why people do or do not commit a crime. Similarly, did the person decide not to commit the crime or did the victim prevent the crime by applying prevention measures so the opportunity was not present. Here again, prevention of crime is something that can not be measured.
Theories can argue one point or the other all day long. Until you work with someone who has killed someone, spoken to them, obtained the confession (or denial) from them, you can not fully understand all the factors involved. Some argue murder is committed out of passion or for financial reasons how about spur of the moment just not thinking clearly anger? How about lack of self control? If society had the answers we surely would not have any crime.
Others argue that countries that do not have the death penalty do not have the crime rate. Can you really compare apples to oranges areas in which different cultures and customs shape everyone differently? Study research methods and you quickly learn how many, if not most, of these arguments are results of studies biased toward the end result.
A deterrent is something that stops something from happening. Is the death penalty a deterrent? Maybe the question should be what does deter murder so the lessons learned can be shared by all, but how would we find enough people who thought about murdering someone but did not (that would admit it) to do research on.
The death penalty is a punishment for certain crimes. Maybe in reality it is there so the rest of the law abiding public feels safer. Maybe it is there so those who prey on people are stopped from further preying. Maybe it is there for the horrendous crimes that our society is becoming desensitized to. In today's scientific culture it could be argued fewer innocent are sentenced so the chances of an innocent dying for another's crime is lessened.
But we still have not answered the question is the death penalty an effective crime deterrent? The only person the death penalty deters from crime is the person who it is used on so at least for one person, yes it is.
Learn more about this author, Karen Moore.
Click here to send author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The last execution in England took place on 13 August 1964. And the death penalty was abolished in 1969. It remain...read more
by Larry Head
Is the Death Penalty and effective deterrent to crime? Indeed it is. "How so", do you ask. "How does taking the li...read more
by Skye Martin
"If the USA's capital justice system were a private company, it would have been shut down long ago. After three deca...read more
by Stephen Bate
The justification and existence of the death penalty is an extremely difficult subject for many of us to rationalize....read more
Add your voice
Know something about Is the death penalty an effective crime deterrent??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA)
The National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause....more
hide