There are 55 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #8 by Helium's members.
Once a child enters the worlds of medicine, psychology and psychiatry, they are labeled with a diagnosis the practitioner believes most closely fit's the child's condition or behavior. Unfortunately, children are often labeled with such disorders as Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD), or Autism long before the child is old enough for the professional to make an accurate diagnosis.
Documentation of that diagnosis in the child's medical record consists of a code to represent that diagnosis. Unfortunately, these codes are not always specific to the exact problem, but must be used to bill for their services, and are often required in order to acquire certain therapies or to pay for prescribed medications. This "label" may be needed on documentation for the purposes mentioned above, but it should not become the child's identity.
Upon entering the educational system, these labels become a part of the child's permanent school record, often seen by staff long before they meet the child. The school accepts that the label is correct and expectations and standards are set for the child based on that information. Even though such records are confidential, this information is often relayed to others within the school who are not currently involved in the child's education, and stereotypes and prejudices develop - all before anyone has direct contact with the child.
All of a sudden, Johnny is not Johnny, Johnny is "that Autistic boy" or "that ADHD kid". Labels have prompted the educational system to see Johnny as a diagnosis, not as an individual. The diagnosis that was used to identify the symptoms is now being used to identify the child.
An Individualized Education Program is developed by those directly responsible for Johnny's education. Others, who may have never met Johnny, become involved to decide the direction his education will take and what services they will provide. Often the focus is on Johnny's limitations, and provides lowered expectations based on the clinical description of what a person with his particular "label" can or can not accomplish.
Such labels provide a reason that the child may not be learning according to educational standards. Rather than looking for ways the educational system may be failing the child, the child is blamed because of their labeled disorder. Professionals may choose to follow preconceived misconceptions of the condition instead of getting to know Johnny personally and assessing his strengths
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The dangers of labeling a child
Children are like sponges and tend to absorb everything we adults say and do. It imprints
by Jim Mcfalls
Labeling children is a double-edged sword. Unfortunately, as with handling any sword, particularly one with two edges, it
by A. Major
Labeling is a necessary evil. As much as I am a victim of labeling and am guilty of labeling others, I would have to argue
The dangers of labeling a child are many! Children learn what they live. If a child is taught that she is a worthwhile person,
by Sammy Stein
A label is something which sticks! How many people do you hear talking about someone who say ' He's mean', or ' watch her,
View All Articles on:
The dangers of labeling a child
Add your voice
Know something about The dangers of labeling a child ?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Food for Everyone Foundation has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Food ...more
hide