1 of 16

No

Write now Print Email Article Invite a writer™ Add to Favorites Contact this writer

In my humble opinion, there should be a graduated (or de-graduated) licensing process for the elderly similar to those adopted in some states for teens. If you pass the test you drive, and if you don't pass the test you don't drive. Simple. As you get older the on site recertification process is more frequent

If you're eight-five years old with all your faculties in tact and in good health with ample vision and hearing capabilities and also command passing grades in an annual driving test then, yes you should be able to drive.

However, if a case should arise similar to that of my own mother where she became nervous and confused in her sixties, then driving is a privilege that should be lost. In her case it turned out to be Parkinson's Disease advancing into the dementia stage. She would not have passed a driving test and should not have been allowed to drive at the time a police officer found her stopped in a busy lane of traffic, confused and angry.

For every elderly individual like my mother there are several more that are very capable of driving and for that reason should be allowed to drive. The government deciding that seventy years of age is the cut off age for driving is ridiculous. I say that because it would simply be another encroachment on personal rights and "big brother" telling us what to do with our lives and when.

The testing process is a fair and equal method, so long as it is managed correctly. It goes back to issues with other laws and regulations, especially with traffic and driving. That is that more laws are not the answer rather enforcing the ones we have in place. If you pass the test legitimately then you maintain your right and privilege and unfortunately if you fail then you lose that right.

Mandating cut off ages also poses a huge burden on the rest of the public in another way which is in the form of added costs in providing some sort of transportation system to those who can not drive any more. Yes, I understand from the right wing hard cases that it should be the responsibility of the family to take car of those now left without wheels; I'm one of those hard cases, but if government is the one laying down the law then it should also bear some of the responsibility of the fallout. I took the responsibility of seeing that my mother,who I love very much, was in a safe and healthy environment. She has access to anywhere she wants to go most of the time which isn't as good as anytime but a positive compromise.

There are hundreds of thousands if not millions of elderly, tax paying and capable elderly citizens that should still maintain that right to grab the keys and go for a drive, get their hair done, go to church, buy groceries, walk at the park, dance at the VFW, bowl, or eat at their favorite restaurant at 4:00 in the afternoon - at their leisure - just like the rest of us.

Learn more about this author, John Stuart.
Click here to send author comments or questions.

more options

hide

Add your voice

Know something about Should there be a maximum age limit for driving in the US??
We want to hear your view. Write now!