Where Knowledge Rules

Entertainment:

Music

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Are aging rock superstars like Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones timeless or too old to perform on stage anymore?

Results so far:

Too old
27% 516 votes Total: 1901 votes
Timeless
73% 1385 votes

Let the old guys rock as long as they can! The whole generation that is responsible for these aging rockers is different. They are former hippies, Vietnam veterans and protesters, and, most notably, they were the first group of teens to be influenced by rock and roll. Their senior years and senior entertainers are going to be atypical. Did anyone quibble with Frank Sinatra when he was still performing in his eighties? He wore a tuxedo instead of tie-dye but he was still a grandpa. (Well, maybe there are valid reasons no one quibbled with Sinatra.)

Who is to say what is appropriate for a particular age group? Does anyone expect Mick Jagger to do anything but prance around in tight pants? It's not pretty now but, if we're honest, it wasn't pretty then, either. Has Keith Richards EVER looked well? No. Beer companies do not sponsor their tours anymore, either. The Stones's last tour was advertised by an investment firm, or something equally as non-counter culture. They are catering to the same audience with different needs. They should keep going as long as they and their audience can.

Not to mention this first crop of senior rock stars inhabits a profession that celebrates creativity and talent, or, at least, gutsy flamboyance. They do not need to retire, to fade into reruns of "The Ed Sullivan Show." These sixty-somethings can still touch their fans with their music. And they can reach younger people who are not jaded by ageism. Everyone has something to say and should be heard, after all.

Dylan and his cronies prove that being a senior citizen does not mean one's life has ended. The radio dial (what's a dial?) never has to be tuned to Muzak. The songs of youth still play on "oldies" stations and touch the soul, bringing levity to everyday life. So why not take in a concert while McCartney remembers the words? He still puts on a good show. And he's still "the cute one" from the cheap seats.

Besides, this is my parents' generation being scrutinized. The older I get, the younger they seem. Will my music make sense in thirty years? R. E. M.? Red Hot Chili Peppers? How much sense does it make now? Not much. But I'm looking forward to spending my childrens' inheritance on being entertained by my favorite rock stars.

Learn more about this author, Emily Buziewicz.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Are aging rock superstars like Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones timeless or too old to perform on stage anymore?

Timeless
  • 1 of 151

    by B. B. James

    It's a conundrum. Or, to put it in terms of a record, it's an "A" side and a "B" side. On the "A" side, there's nothing

    read more

  • 2 of 151

    by Damien Baldino

    I enjoy attending concerts and seeing both new and upcoming bands, and performers that have been around a while. When I

    read more

Too old
  • 1 of 38

    by Joseph Whalen

    While their music may be timeless their bodies and their ability to perform clearly is not. There comes a time in everyone's

    read more

  • 2 of 38

    by Barbara Stanley

    Mick Jagger, bless his heart, could never be found guilty of being handsome. Fine wine might get better with age, but Mick

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Are aging rock superstars like Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones timeless or too old to perform on stage anymore? ?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA