There are 25 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #17 by Helium's members.
There are mountains of proof against evolution. There is so much in fact, I have no clue where to begin. I will of course provide you with supporting resources from a site which does thorough job of answering the controversy. First of all, I can't resist... What came first? The chicken or the egg?
The evolutionists have a big problem here. Assuming evolution is true, something had to turn into a chicken, or lay an egg that hatched a chicken. There is no evidence that a dog can lay a chicken egg. Also, supposing a chicken did come out of another animal, what would that chicken mate with? Animals are male and female, if evolution is true, the odds against both a male and female evolving near enough each other to propagate is ridiculous. There is no evidence that a chicken egg can come from anything but a hen anyways. On the other hand, if creation is true, which I believe it is for there is not one contradiction anywhere in scriptures (if you go by the King James or the original records of it), the answer is very simple, and very logical. The chicken came first. Without a chicken, you can't have a chicken egg, does that make sense?
(I have leapfrogged, because some critic said I missed the point. No, I did not miss the point. When God created everything, everything was full grown. He did not create Adam and Eve as babies, give them a packet of seeds, and tell them to raise their own garden of eden... Likewise, the hens and roosters were created fully grown. THIS is how creation solves the dilemma of the chicken and the egg. God made a full grown chicken, that laid the first egg. Just because chickens come from eggs doesn't mean God couldn't have created the chicken fully matured, and that it must have came from an egg.)
I am not necessarily going to disprove evolution, for I will leave it up to a more qualified than I source to cover it, and it is thoroughly covered too. The seminars are downloadable on creation vs evolution, both sides evidences are evenly and systematically gone over, thoroughly I will add, and they are free. Dr. Kent Hovind is the expert, and he has debated a lot of evolutionists, and I believe the reward he offers is $100,000 in cold hard cash if anyone can provide evidence for evolution. I am not an expert on evolution. I can only put forth the things I know, remember, and have examined.
(I will also add in this leapfrogged edition, that some of the following passages are merely to demonstrate the bible's competence in matters of science. Here
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The theory of evolution is about as close to scientific fact as anything else that is taken by most people to be a fact.
by JC Campbell
The theory of Evolution has been a subject for discussion for more than a century, and though it is still only a theory,
CREATION IS EVOLUTION
by Randy Crum
Evolution is scientific and, by definition, suggests ways in which it could be falsified or disproven. For example if a mammalian
"Real Science" = The ability to prove a formula by being able to re-create it over and over again in a laboratory setting
View All Articles on:
Disproving evolution
Add your voice
Know something about Disproving evolution?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
eSpindle Learning builds literacy one word at a time. Our mission is to help learners of all skill levels develop ...more
hide