Channel Button

There are 22 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #10 by Helium's members.

Arts & Humanities   >

Philosophical Concepts

Get a Widget for this title

Science vs. religion: Understanding the differences

So, the other day a friend asked me if I believed that the Big Bang theory was a pretty accurate representation of how the universe was formed. I said "Sure, it's pretty much been mathematically proven." And he was surprised by this because I'm a Christian-and like most people brought up in our public education system, he was raised with the belief that if you're a Christian, then you are not allowed to believe in anything scientific. Well, for the record, I also believe in gravity.

This whole schism between Science and Religion is one of Satan's greatest accomplishments, right up there with the whole separation of Church and State Myth.

I was not raised a Christian. Neither of my parents are Christians. I was educated in a school system that quashes free-thought and teaches that God does not exist. I was saved when I was 28 years old, which does not happen a lot from a statistical viewpoint. So, what earth-shattering event caused me to become a Christian? Near-death experience? The water in the reservoir turning to blood? No.

Einstein proved mathematically that God exists. It's true, although you will never ever hear that in a public classroom.

Was Einstein a Christian saved by grace? No. But he determined mathematically that the universe could not have possibly been formed by random chance in a finite period of time. He knew instinctively that in order for a random and chaotic universe to spontaneously create life required one thing to work: infinity. Then, unfortunately, while developing his theory of relativity he accidentally discovered that the universe has a beginning something along the lines of 15 billion years ago. His first instinct was to fudge the equation on his "static universe model" formula by adding a "cosmological constant" which essentially was an extra undefinable quantity (in the form of a Greek letter) added to both sides of the equation in order to make the universe infinitely old and thus allowing him to remain an atheist. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Later, Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist-a believer in an impersonal creator God.

So, to start wrapping up and going back to the beginning of this article, yes, I believe in the Big Bang Theory. Why? Because it's in the first three words of the Bible, "In the beginning." According to Genesis 1:1, the entire universe came into existence, brand new, a finite time ago. In the final decade of the twentieth century, astronomers and physicists have established that all of the matter and energy in the universe, and all of the space-time dimensions within which the matter and energy are distributed, had a beginning in finite time (simultaneously proving that Buddhism and Hinduism are scientifically inaccurate since their doctrines teach that reality is infinite).

Of course there's way more to it then that. Genesis 1:1 through 1:11 goes step by step through everything that we currently understand about how Earth was formed. Starting with the second epoch God creates water and microorganisms, then dry land, then vegetation, then the atmosphere switches from opaque to transparent, then comes aquatic life, then the birds, then the higher mammals, then man. Which is a pretty simple yet accurate depiction of the fossil record and everything that scientists have ever discovered about the development of life on Earth.

Learn more about this author, Matt Lau.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Science vs. religion: Understanding the differences

  • 1 of 22

    by Chelsea Donoho

    Life is complicated. How could something so detailed and delicate have come into being? Was it created by some freak accident

    read more

  • 2 of 22

    by Steve Lussing

    Scientific fields of endeavor are disciplines. They have become empirical schools of study which constantly seek to form

    read more

  • 3 of 22

    by Magius

    Science and religion, while often perceived as mutually exclusive, are in fact fully compatible.

    There are a few issues on

    read more

  • 4 of 22

    by Eric Blair

    As the boundaries of our scientific knowledge are pushed back in all disciplines and as religion and religious groups begin

    read more

  • 5 of 22

    by Dr Nash

    Science is an inquiry into truth while Religion is a belief in a superior power and both have different births, functions

    read more

View All Articles on:
Science vs. religion: Understanding the differences

Add your voice

Know something about Science vs. religion: Understanding the differences?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

242491

Featured Partner

Teachers Without Borders (TWB)

TEACHER CONNECTIONS WRITING CONTEST: November 18 - December 9, 2009 Teachers Without Borders has partnered with He...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA