by Daniel J. Gansle

Created on: February 28, 2008

The question of whether multinational energy companies should adhere to U.S. environmental policy overseas is a thorny one. As a business concerned with pleasing its shareholders with infinitely rising stock valuations, it makes sense from a dollars and cents perspective to act in their best interest and keep costs down by forgoing the myriad of environmental concerns in fragile ecosystems such as the Amazon. Besides, if the country in which the business is being conducted places a higher premium on revenue versus the environment, any logical-thinking corporate executive would naturally choose to make as much money as possible to the exclusion of the local ecology.

And then there's the question of ethnocentrism: the endemic attitude of rightful American superiority and domination over and above the "uncivilized" non-western nations. No more evident is this pervasive ethnocentrism than in American business. While capitalism is in fact the most viable and wealth-producing socioeconomic model in the world today, it should be met with an anthropological understanding of and respect for other environments and cultures; not simply the old model of domination and capricious disregard for the local ecology and populace. As a result of the multinationals' realization that they need a new, more eco-friendly face for their business operations, they are beginning to run numerous advertisements and promotional spots in the media portraying themselves as gentle helpers rather than indiscriminate destroyers of the environment.

Case in point is the veritable tidal wave of new promotional advertising by the large multinational petroleum and agricultural companies, particularly on Sunday mornings. While watching my weekly dose of Meet the Press and The McLaughlin Group, I was mesmerized by soaring oratory, scenic pastures, and promises of alternative energy and environmentalism. And no wonder; for this new brand of softer, gentler capitalism has the beneficial effect of vastly increasing the bottom line.

These and other promotional programs are designed to change people's minds and persuade them that the multinationals aren't really the big bad global polluters and environmental destroyers they're made out to be. It's a move to reinvent their public face and in fact, their entire ethos. But whether they are truly concerned with the environment or are implementing these changes purely for monetary gain is hotly debated. Furthermore, one must wonder whether these companies are simply

• 1
• 2
• Next Page >>