There are 30 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 43% | 175 votes | Total: 408 votes | |
| No | 57% | 233 votes |
must only be created to purchase financially feasible loans made by commercial banks to form private sector capital, not fund government or consumer expenditures. If the commercial banks were to institute a 100% reserve requirement (similar to the "Chicago Plan" proposed in the 1930s), there would be no danger of the "multiplier effect" being manipulated by commercial banks or governments to create unbacked currency to compete with the currency or demand deposits backed by private sector assets instead of government debt.
4. All new capital formation (that is, all new capital formed in excess of what is needed to replace existing assets as they wear out) must be financed in ways that create new owners, not concentrate ownership of the new capital in the hands of the currently wealthy. This will increase incomes across the board without taking anything away from the currently wealthy, who can be left secure in their existing accumulations.
These principles - and others, derived from them intended to support their implementation and maintenance - are necessary to the economic and political feasibility of any single global currency. Without these essential principles being embodied in the operation of the commercial and central banking systems of the world, it will be possible to manipulate any global currency for the benefit or advantage of a few, instead of using the uniquely social good of money and credit for the good of everyone in the world. As Henry C. Adams noted in 1898, manipulation of money and credit through unwise government spending or borrowing is the surest way to undermine and finally destroy the sovereignty of nations. Run in a manner consistent with the above principles, a global currency would enhance national and, especially, individual sovereignty. Managed in a way that simply continues current central bank policies and financing techniques, the result of a global currency would be oppression and tyranny.
Learn more about this author, Michael Greaney.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The idea of a single global currency is not only feasible in our day and age, it has been effectively implemented a number
by Colin Morley
This is a truly fascinating debate. As I write, the 'yes' side of the argument is losing, yet has more than twice as many
A single global currency makes the assumption that all of humanity has the same needs. Nations of the world have different
by John Talleos
One world single currency has a nice ring to it. It's has though the world were one country with one identity. This is the
Add your voice
Know something about Could a single global currency work??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Breakthrough India has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Breakthrough's ...more
hide