There are 86 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #4 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Yes, the US should be held to a higher environmental standard than the rest of the world. We have benefited from a superior economic growth powered by consumption of a major share of the world's fossil fuels, causing a major share of the world's environmental pollution. We are technically equipped to lead toward a higher environmental standard. Currently, however, it would be a major challenge for the US to assume this leadership role. We will have to wait for a new administration that, hopefully, will want this role for us.
The Bush administration has continued to reject actions to reduce global warming pollution. It has refused to require cuts in heat-trapping carbon dioxide pollution, significantly raise fuel economy requirements, or hold companies accountable for improving their energy efficiency using wind, solar and other renewable energy sources. In his final FY2009 budget request, President Bush accurately reflected his administration's low priority for environmental help.
Again, President Bush stripped critical funds protecting America's communities and natural resources, and instead rewarded dirty industries. All of this followed his State of the Union Address touting his commitment to advance clean, renewable resources and reduce dependence on oil. A quote from President Bush' speech on energy was "The United States is committed to strengthening our energy security and confronting global climate change. And the best way to meet these goals is for America to continue leading the way toward the development of cleaner and more energy-efficient technology".
Despite the president's more aggressive statements on fighting climate change, his budget request would reduce funding for energy efficiency and renewable energy such as wind, solar, etc. The president gets much of that reduction by slashing funding from $280 million to $60 million for low-income households to "weatherize" their homes with new windows, better insulation and other efforts.
As a frame of reference, the Green Budget, which is used in Congress' budget deliberations, recommends a FY2009 Weatherizing budget of $300 million dollars. On average, the Department of Energy has stated that weatherizing reduces heating bills by 31 percent and overall energy bills by $358 per year. The total 2009 request for Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, a major Department of Energy agency, is $1.255 billion, a 27 percent cut from the 2008 level of $1.722 billion. The Green Budget recommendation
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The global community is in near-universal agreement that climate change is a major challenge which requires correspondingly
The argument for insisting that America should face the strongest environmental sanctions is often based on the notion that
"I would ask the United States, we ask for your leadership. But if for some reason you're not willing to lead, leave it to
by Paul Calhoun
Yes, the US should be held to a higher environmental standard than the rest of the world. We have benefited from a superior
by Dave Hughes
Since the dawn of the Industrial Revolution, the United States endeavored to become the global leader in every single technological
View All Articles on:
Should a global climate agreement hold the US to a higher environmental standard than the rest of the world?
Add your voice
Know something about Should a global climate agreement hold the US to a higher environmental standard than the rest of the world??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Teachers Without Borders (TWB)
TEACHER CONNECTIONS WRITING CONTEST: November 18 - December 9, 2009 Teachers Without Borders has partnered with He...more
hide