Show All Channels Show All Channels

There are 12 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.

Education   >

Special Education

Assessments for learning disabilities: How to identify an LD

Learning disabilities come in a variety of forms. There are reading disabilities, for which the most common term used is dyslexia. The common term for a math disability is dyscalcula and the corresponding term for a writing disability is dysgraphia. These terms are specific to a disability within the area mentioned and do not cover the whole scope of disability. For example, dyslexia encompasses reading difficulties that deal with decoding skills, not comprehension, per se. What they all have in common is the fact that the person who has a learning disability has neurological processing differences, so they process information differently than other people.

Children with learning disabilities are not mentally impaired. Most are of average IQ and are able to learn with certain coping mechanisms in place. It is more difficult for them to learn so they are easily frustrated. A student that is learning disabled will often come across as very bright and still struggle in the classroom. That is often a clue that the teacher should pursue an evaluation to determine whether or not the student has a learning disability.

Diagnosing a learning disability in a child is a very complicated process. Historically, to determine the presence of a learning disability, schools have tested the student's IQ and achievement and through a discrepancy model have determined that a student had a disability. The idea is that if a child with an average or above IQ is not achieving at a level that is commensurate with their IQ then a learning disability exists.

Currently in the educational community, there exists some debate as to whether or not the discrepancy model is the most effective way of making a diagnosis. Some psychologists believe that the reliance upon the this model has left out students who need help. The debate has led to the development of the RTI (Response to Intervention) assessment model. This model, rather than measuring and comparing IQ and achievement, identifies students who are not being successful, gives them help and then determines whether or not more services are needed. Unfortunately, using RTI sometimes misdiagnoses students with mental retardation and emotional disabilities as learning disabled.

One of the drawbacks with the RTI diagnosis, is that it tends to put slow learners into the same category as those with learning disabilities. A drawback of the discrepancy method is that not all children who need help will be diagnosed as


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Assessments for learning disabilities: How to identify an LD

  • 1 of 12

    by Jules Willis

    Learning disabilities come in a variety of forms. There are reading disabilities, for which the most common term used... read more

  • 2 of 12

    by Shelly Mcrae

    Learning disabilities are processing disorders associated with the academic skills of reading, writing, and mathemati... read more

  • 3 of 12

    by Curt Jeffryes

    If you are just beginning your journey on understanding learning disabilities, then it would be wise to dispel some c... read more

View All Articles on:
Assessments for learning disabilities: How to identify an LD

Add your voice

Know something about Assessments for learning disabilities: How to identify an LD?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

125667

Featured Partner

Life in the Bible Institute

The Life in the Bible Institute has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse it...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA