Home > Education > Special Education
Created on: February 21, 2008
Labeling children is a double-edged sword. Unfortunately, as with handling any sword, particularly one with two edges, it is likely to result in bloodletting.
On the one hand,it is impossible to get needed educational or psychological services in today's world without being assigned a label which allows you access and funding. Parents of children with learning and/or behavioral problems will often go to great lengths to get a label such as "Autism Spectrum Disorder" that will provide their child with special supports and services such as therapies and medications. Without the label, no supports are forthcoming.
On the other hand, labels stick forever. I have seen files over 30 years old that still have front and center an old "Borderline Schizophrenic" diagnosis underlined and starred. After all that time, with no other supporting evidence, the label has dogged them and stopped them from getting jobs, educational opportunities, and even worse, self-esteem. Whatever good the label may have done for the person in the past in terms of giving them access to education or services, now the label has become the person.
Other labels don't even have the potential for benefit seen above. Undoubtedly many of you have suffered from racial labels, gender labels, and left-over educational labels. How many of you were "slow-learners?" Were you in the "Turtles" reading group? Did you live in "that" neighborhood? All of these are examples of labels that children contend with, absorb, and ultimately live for the rest of their lives. These labels then, define the person not just in other people's minds, but worse, by the children themselves.
As I write this, one of every one hundred and fifty children IN THE WORLD is being diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder! Only ten or so years ago, this same diagnosis was applied to only one in ten-thousand. It is reaching the point that the question might well be asked: If so many people have the label, what value does the label have other than to certify mass deviance in our up and coming generations? Labeling then is not just a danger to our children, but to our society.
Learn more about this author, Jim Mcfalls.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The dangers of labeling a child
I prefer the term "diagnosis". This term is defined as "the act or process of identifying or determining the nature and
by Tami Joia
If your child has a disability such as Autism, ADHD, Bipolar, etc, and he/she is not diagnosed, the definite danger is you
To label a child in derogatory terms is one of the worst things that anyone could do. The mind of a child is pliable, and
by Crystal Cook
The knowledge and insight I have attained over the past eighteen years working with the school system, medical professionals
Labeling is for classification, as in the field of science, or organization of office files and personal identification.
View All Articles on: The dangers of labeling a child
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Returning local control to schools will enhance education
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Takes All Types has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Takes All Types' featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, learn...more