Channel Button

There are 11 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #9 by Helium's members.

Arts & Humanities   >

Ancient History

Get a Widget for this title

The trial and death of Socrates

wasn't to harm them, but to teach them that a continuous pursuit of knowledge was the most important mindset a leader could have. Socrates would be accused of crimes he didn't commit, like taking money for his public and private debates, even though he thought knowledge should be free.

The legal system was a little different then it is now. The jury pool was significantly larger, and the sentencing of a guilty verdict was different than that of today's societies. It wasn't uncommon for a jury to have up to 500 people, as oppose to the generally acceptable 12 in the United States today. And unlike the U.S. today, their society lived by a majority rules verdict in a trial, instead of, a required unanimous decision. Finally, instead of a judge deciding what the sentence should be, they required both the prosecution and the defense to submit a sentence for the jury pool to decide upon. It is easy to see that if Socrates had lived in our times, he would have gotten an acceptable verdict and sentence.

Many still wonder why it was that Socrates represented himself in the trial, and why he submitted the sentence he did. However, it is an easier conclusion to come to then you think. Socrates must have known that if he was banished to some remote location he would have remained the same person, and this would probably have annoyed his new society to the point of putting him on trial again, probably for the same things. He knew the only way to end the influence he had, which annoyed many to the point it did, would be if his life was over. As long as Socrates lived, he would continue his public pursuit of knowledge and debating with important people, no matter where he was. Death is the only way to end Socrates' influence that is why Socrates submitted the sentence he did. However, even death could not kill the influence Socrates had, for his apprentices like Plato continued his work to some extent, and Socrates is still a subject of great discussion today.

Learn more about this author, Jasper P. Randolph.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

The trial and death of Socrates

  • 1 of 11

    by Marcus Willock

    Plato's Apology of Socrates has nothing to do with apologizing. Within Greek society, the word apologize means to defend.

    read more

  • 2 of 11

    by Janet Grischy

    Did Socrates corrupt youth? That is one of the crimes for which he was sentenced to die.

    The impulse, reading the versions

    read more

  • 3 of 11

    by EMoore

    Isn't it amazing that injustice never rests? The trial and death of Socrates in 399 BC by five hundred Greek citizens was

    read more

  • 4 of 11

    by Aaron Morgan

    Socrates was the greatest and most passionate thinker who ever existed in the ancient world and probably even today; he is

    read more

  • 5 of 11

    by Jennifer Smith

    THE TRIAL AND DEATH OF SOCRATES

    Beginning around 585B.C, in the Greek cities circling Ionia (Asia Minor), Western Philosophy

    read more

View All Articles on:
The trial and death of Socrates

Add your voice

Know something about The trial and death of Socrates?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Imperialism: Was it right to settle in distant lands?

Click for your side.

176597

Featured Partner

New England Coalition for Sustainable Population (NECSP)

New England Coalition for Sustainable Population's (NECSP) mission is to raise awareness in New England of regional, ...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA