There are 22 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #18 by Helium's members.
As the Fox News Channel has risen in viewership and significance in the media landscape, a terrifying new breed of ultra-conservative thought has eeked into the public sphere. The hard right has convinced a nation of people too intoxicated by sensationalistic television news to do any research that speaking out against the President's illegal, hypocritical, and grossly immoral actions somehow amounts to treason. It is our duty as Americans to reclaim our right to voice our opinions, and to question the leadership of our country.
Talking head facists like Bill O'Reilly and Ann Coulter have polluted the national discourse by insisting that their views (which are extreme, reactionary, and out of step with educated Americans) are the "American" views, and that those that disagree are somehow not patriotic. Besides the fact that I don't think either of them actually belive that (they're both well-educated and masters at media manipulation), it is patently false. It's not for nothing that the very first amendement to the Constitution guarantees that citizens can speak freely, without fear of reprisals from the government. By mobilizing an army of people who aren't free thinkers, who have a childish, black-and-white view of the world, and who aren't particularly well-educated, they have built a voting block of people who are warmly embracing facism, all the while thinking their waving a flag of freedom.
Freedom cannot exist in the absence of dissent. Look at countries like China, where political rebels and journalists are routinely jailed or "disappeared" for expressing views that contradict what is coming out of the government. In Islamic fundamentalist states, those who speak out against the ruling parties are frequently killed in gruesome ways. These are not the kinds of governments we should be patterning ourselves on, yet the corporate interests that fund the Republican party are desperate to stop the spread of free speech, and the connected ideas of workers rights, living wage, environmental responsibility, and corporate accounatability. By silencing his critics with the "unpatriotic" label, Bush and his criminal cronies have successfully turned our democracy toward theocratic totalitarianism, a situation our citizens are only now waking up to, now that our record surplus is an unprecedented national debt, and thousands of our brave young men and women have been slaughtered for the profit gain of large multi-nationals.
It is not only unpatriotic not to speak out against Bush and his crimes, it is unpatriotic to suggest that we shouldn't. It is Coulter, O'Reilly, and their ilk that are the traitors, and if they don't like the freedom that my country provides, they can get the hell out.
Learn more about this author, B.D. Bolin.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Patriotism is usually defined as the love of one's country, and in this sense Bush-bashing, or the criticism of any president
The only way that Bush-bashing could be unpatriotic is if George W. Bush is perfectly infallible and is completely impartial
This is yet another loaded question.
Is it wrong to critique our leaders? Heavens no. They should be constantly challenged
"Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech...and the right to petition the government for a redress of
Yes, it is unpatriotic. President Bush has much to deal with during his administration. Unfortunately, most have forgotten
View All Articles on:
Is Bush-bashing unpatriotic
Add your voice
Know something about Is Bush-bashing unpatriotic?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Breakthrough India has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Breakthrough's ...more
hide