Channel Button

There are 160 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #12 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Death Penalty

Is the death penalty an effective crime deterrent?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

Yes
41% 524 votes Total: 1279 votes
No
59% 755 votes

The death penalty is no doubt a touchy subject, but it does have its pros and cons. Every person judges his daily activities by what is lawfully correct and wrong. If there were no laws and no punishment for the disobeying of these laws, people would do whatever they please. They follow these laws because of the threat of punishment; it is man's attitude according to nature that allows him the right of self-preservation. Possible victims protect themselves, as John Locke states in "The Second Treatise of Government" through "which is so much as may serve for reparation and restraint." Man uses punishment to retrieve what he has lost due to the unlawful, and also to prevent future copycats. The death penalty is used as the ultimate restraint from future crime. No one wants to die; it is against their nature. Men fight for survival; the last thing they want to do is put themselves in a situation in which they would face death. Therefore criminals are less likely to commit a crime when there is a possibility for the death sentence then when there is not.

Though the death penalty is the perfect deterrent, it is a poor way to punish a human being, or achieve fair reparation. There is no certain way to know someone committed a crime, and killing an innocent human being is immoral and useless to the cause. That is what makes this question so hard. According to the question, yes it is the perfect crime deterrent, but it is the worst form of punishment. It does not seem worth the risk of killing innocent human beings, however, if we abolish the death penalty I strongly believe the crime rates will increase. There is no greater threat to a human being than death, and therefore it is the best and in most cases, only form of deterrent. People simply need to accept the fact that the justice system will never be fair and decide for themselves whether the death penalty is worth it or not. Crime rates may rise, but people will be less likely to die innocently through the immediate death penalty. However on the other side, if crime rises, innocents will die in those crimes instead. This is an issue that will not go away silently or slowly and it will be interesting to see how it will evolve in the coming years.

Learn more about this author, Louis Dicrescentis.
Contact this writer Click here to send author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is the death penalty an effective crime deterrent?

Yes
  • 1 of 55

    by Louise Keeble

    The last execution in England took place on 13 August 1964. And the death penalty was abolished in 1969. It remain...read more

  • 2 of 55

    by Larry Head

    Is the Death Penalty and effective deterrent to crime? Indeed it is. "How so", do you ask. "How does taking the li...read more

No
  • 1 of 105

    by Skye Martin

    "If the USA's capital justice system were a private company, it would have been shut down long ago. After three deca...read more

  • 2 of 105

    by Stephen Bate

    The justification and existence of the death penalty is an extremely difficult subject for many of us to rationalize....read more

Add your voice

Know something about Is the death penalty an effective crime deterrent??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

118457

Featured Partner

Why Tuesday

Why Tuesday is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that was founded in 2005. Its goal is to raise awareness about t...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User Agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA