on Oprah one year. I saw a segment of the show and Oprah was quite beside herself with him and more importantly the clip they borrowed from the show which sees Mr. Darcy plunge into a lake with his flouncy white shirt. There was a glint in Oprah's eyes and in the eyes of every woman in the room. It was the same one in my wife's eyes when she and I watched "Pride and Prejudice" together, especially in the previous scenes when Mr. Darcy is wearing a similar shirt in dueling practice and working up quite a sweat. That's right, dueling is not only good exercise - if you win - it's also sexy.
Surely not you gasp in horror. Oh it is indeed true, as one of my former countrymen proved in 2000. That's right, "Are you not entertained?" bayed Russell Crowe's Maximus to the crowd in Gladiator, rather ironically. For indeed we were, and the dueling General who became a hero to Rome won an Oscar and proved that dueling was quite a sexy sport. I saw the glint again in my wife's eye, and Russell and I share a very similar accent.
Think of the benefits to business and say the current election campaign if squabbles and disputes could be settled in a more direct and gentlemanly, or womanly, way. None of the nasty threats of litigation, petty taunts and back stabbing we're so fond of today. Imagine the evaporation of meaningless spittle if the candidates had to actually back the fighting talk with real fighting. Then we'd all know who the better candidate was, one who was prepared to actually back the rhetoric with action, not just promises or words from an ensemble of legally trained mumbo jumbo conjurers.
Unequivocally, the reinstatement of dueling as a mechanism for solving disputes would benefit modern societies, even at the international level. I would prefer swords, since it evokes the image of knights more towards the Elizabethan age where thinking and speaking were just as important as smashing skulls with a broadsword. However, I would certainly feel comfortable with one of those delightful ancient pistols which were just as likely to explode in your face. The rigor attached to the whole procedure, decency and appropriateness, accountability and sensibility, are all things sadly missing from our so called modern societies and sadly not for the better.
Learn more about this author, Nathan Hook.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
During the 18th century dueling was the norm, only because it helped a justice system that was very lacking, in punishing
by Nathan Hook
At last, a topic worth debating! The answer, quite obviously is, yes. Indeed, let's dispense with the overly paid super
by Andrew Linn
Of course dueling would benefit society! Not only would it be easy to implement, it would be a system which has as its backbone
by Rinaldo Sax
Yes, I believe that if implemented well that legalized dueling would be a benefit to society. I think it would generate
by Jon Neumann
No, legalized dueling would be detrimental to modern societies, as it would destablize and undermine the social peace that
View All Articles on:
Would legalized dueling be a benefit to modern societies?
Add your voice
Know something about Would legalized dueling be a benefit to modern societies??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
OpentheGovernment.org (OTG) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Openth...more
hide