It's hard to believe how people's opinions and subsequent beliefs are so profoundly affected by the slanted reporting of the national mainstream news media. And once those opinions harden and become reflected in various opinion polls, the party out of power perceives a weakness and therefore an opportunity to unseat the incumbents. Then let the negative attacks and the political games begin. But on issues of safety and survival, do these polls really reflect the nature of a nation?
When some news writer's sound bite is repeated and repeated often enough, it sounds like national policy to the great unwashed. For example, where does the characterization "Bush's war on terror" come from? I thought it was America's war on terror! Pardon my naivet but I distinctly recall being attacked both abroad and at home and for our own protection and the safety of our children, you and I declared war on the terrorists! Suddenly, when things begin to go badly, it becomes "Bush's war on terror"? Give me a break!
So, whom will we send to represent us in Congress in November? Will it be those who want to weaken or repeal the Patriot Act, focus on condemning our treatment of enemy combatants, expose and criticize our surveillance methods and encourage the enemy with their public criticisms of our conduct and progress in Iraq and Afghanistan? Can anyone say "timetable to leave Iraq"?
It's not that all of these positions are entirely without some merit. There is certainly a grain of substance in every one of them, but I would rather have someone in charge that is actually serious about fighting and winning this war on terrorism than appeasing a misguided segment of the electorate. We can still solve those issues and problems while we try to actually win this battle in the war on terror.
The recurrent theme of many of the challengers' current ubiquitous campaign ads is to associate their opponent with "Bush's failed war in Iraq." This is another sound bite that the media loves to propagate. First of all, Congress authorized the President to conduct this war. Some elected officials would like to change their vote and many others weasel out of their vote with excuses and rationalizations. Reality check! The truth is the truth. It's not just Bush's war in Iraq!
Secondly, the majority of the American people re-elected this President in 2004 despite the efforts of the media to over-report polls to the contrary. And finally, since when do we call the outcome of a war while it is still being
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by John Nevola
It's hard to believe how people's opinions and subsequent beliefs are so profoundly affected by the slanted reporting of
It would be amusing for me to criticize George W. Bush, but if I think to the damage and mess that the policy of his administration
by Roy Skillen
On January the 20th 2009 history will be made in the USA. The first ever Black President will be inaugurated, bringing with
by Bob Schmidt
George W. Bush, the 43rd President of the United States, is ending his presidency with the lowest approval rating of any
As a writer and academic who has actively followed US politics for over 40 years, I can honestly say that the state of the
View All Articles on:
Views on George Bush
Add your voice
Know something about Views on George Bush?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Pacific Research Institute (PRI)
The mission of the Pacific Research Institute (PRI) is to champion freedom, opportunity and personal responsibility f...more
hide