Channel Button

There are 18 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #11 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Sciences   >

Anthropology

Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology?

Results so far:

Yes
11% 20 votes Total: 188 votes
No
89% 168 votes

Is Indiana Jones bad for archeology? Is Boston Legal bad for law, or perhaps Brothers and Sisters inappropriate considering that is a presidential nominee on the program? No! Was the Scorpion King, starring the Rock bad for archeology? No! Absolutely not.

Indiana Jones is a fictional character! We know Harrison Ford doesn't have credentials in archaeology. He is an actor. George Lucas didn't discover King Tut's tomb. He is a director.

To make the argument that Indiana Jones in bad for archeology is in my opinion a bit highbrow. It's placing much too much importance on a fun loving fictional character that people have fallen in love with over the years. Instead of looking for flaws, either enjoy the movie for the fluff and adventure that it is, or turn the channel to Discovery or PBS. People that are interested in archeology know the difference, as does the general population.

I think everyone that has watched Indiana Jones films understands that these are fiction and their inception is intended to provide entertainment. People know that a huge boulder chasing Harrison Ford in a mystical temple isn't for real.

If anything, I think fun loving movies such as this offer people a bit of general knowledge that they may now know or understand. Indiana Jones was the first time I had ever heard of the chalice that Christ drank from. Honestly, I learned more about the story when I read another fictional book called The Da Vinci Code. Do I take either story as fact, no I do not, but it raises interesting questions.

Hollywood is supposed to take stories, myths, and exciting adventures and put them on the big screen. Even stories that are supposed to be true to life are often glamorized for entertainment value. Gone with the Wind was a beautiful story but I'm sure historians will find fault with it's story lines and plots.

Harry Potter are excellent books and fine movies, however it in no way has any bearing on Wicken, which is the religion practiced by witches. Everyone understands that Voldermort is fictional and witches don't fly around on brooms playing quidditch.

In conclusion, is Indiana Jones bad for archeology? Absolutely not. Indiana Jones movies are nothing more than that...movies.

Learn more about this author, Molly Carter.
Contact this writer Click here to send author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology?

No
Yes
  • 1 of 1

    by Ray Burke

    Is Indiana Jones Bad for Archaeology?: Archaeology is the search for facts...forget about lost cities and exotic t...read more

Add your voice

Know something about Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Difference of opinion? Debate now.
Anthropology
Is cryptozoology a valid science?
102314

Featured Partner

Appleseed

Appleseed has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to donate your article earnings. Put your knowledge to wo...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA