Channel Button

There are 18 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Sciences   >

Anthropology

Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology?

Results so far:

Yes
11% 20 votes Total: 187 votes
No
89% 167 votes

Indiana Jones is bad for Archaeology like Braveheart is bad for history. It generates additional interest in a subject that many of our youth have little or no interest in. This interest then sparks research into the subject which these youths would not normally undertake. The only bad thing is that the fiction of the movies has given them preconceived notions of what to expect. However, once someone with these ideas is confronted with the cold hard facts of the science, the fiction quickly slips away and is replaced with the genuine facts that spur the fascination on to greater things.

The Indiana Jones movies are without a doubt an entertaining bunch of fantasy with a little bit of historical fact mixed in for legitimacy. It was never the intent of the writers, actors, directors or producers to portray the characters and events in the movies as anything but fantasy. While the stories do draw on actual historical places and objects, they do so with a totally fictitious cast and storyline. At no point in the movie series has there been any allusion that the events are attempting to depict actual archaeology or any cold hard scientific principles.

One of the advantages of having a major motion picture centered around a particular field of science is the good press that field of science receives which it would not have otherwise seen. For instance, the television series CSI does far more to depict itself as scientifically legitimate than the Indian Jones movies do for archaeology. Yet the "science" depicted in CSI for the most part is exaggerated at best. Much like any other fictional entertainment ventures they take a script and use the perception of scientific data to further that script, all the while using only a sprinkling of scientific facts and procedures in order to lend the appearance of credibility to the show. However, the number of college students who took up the sciences associated with Crime Scene Investigation has skyrocketed since the shows inception.

While the number of Archaeology students hasn't hit an all time high in the wake of the Indiana Jones movies, the interest in history in general has. Since Raiders of the Lost Ark has been released we've seen scores of television shows based on archaeology and history created, several actual television networks created that are centered around history, and numerous other academic projects take off that would never have held the same appeal to the American public had the Indiana


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology?

No
  • 1 of 17

    by Amanda Demers

    No, Indiana Jones is not bad for archeology. In fact, I'm sure that a lot of people with an active interest in arche...read more

  • 2 of 17

    by Joseph Whalen

    Indiana Jones is bad for Archaeology like Braveheart is bad for history. It generates additional interest in a subje...read more

Yes
  • 1 of 1

    by Ray Burke

    Is Indiana Jones Bad for Archaeology?: Archaeology is the search for facts...forget about lost cities and exotic t...read more

Add your voice

Know something about Is Indiana Jones bad for archaeology??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Difference of opinion? Debate now.
Anthropology
Is cryptozoology a valid science?
121751

Featured Partner

Sunshine Week

Sunshine Week has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Sunshine Week's feat...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA