There are 97 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #5 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
There is an unfortunate parallel between the imperialist colonization of former periods in history and the present day economic exploitation that necessitates a more pragmatic global review of international business arrangements. Just as the former conquerors with their advanced military and commercial demands rode roughshod over weaker nations for their own economic advancement, so too do the economic powerhouses of today continue to exploit the opportunities that exist in those countries that are measurably weaker, militarily and economically.
The notion existing that it is appropriate for one community to suffer economically or socially for another without concern does in some way reflect the basis of a capitalist system. While that thinking exists it is unlikely to change much however it is not all wrong, what is wrong is the extent of the division that is placed between the two sections and the moral responsibilities that go with that.
Every one can opt out of the economic cycle and choose to live in a cave on the mountain, they don't however and in true capitalistic fashion, it becomes a constant quest for that those at the lower ends of the economic spectrum aspire to match the material pursuits of those at the top.
Where we have come to however is to question how those things are acquired and the moral consciousness that has been avoided by doing so in maintaining the separation. It is a case where economic and trade considerations have been set before our collective moral consciousness.
Within the US for instance where there is one of the most fluid industrial relations provisions in its economy, the government is still obliged to dictate to industry and the community at large certain measures it needs comply with, certain safeguards that determine worker health and safety, to dictate minimum wages that ensure those working at that lower levels have a sustainable income when all other things are considered. It is not a social statement about how people use their income or live their lives but what is an acceptable norm.
So too should be the determination to ensure that working conditions and a general concern for worker general health and safety be a part of global consciousness. To ignore the fact that certain trades or industrial activities have been banned in our own countries yet continue to exist that we may enjoy the benefits of that activity at a affordable price is imperialism at an economic and social level and of a worse kind than that which previously
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
More than any other developing nation, China has profited immensely from the investment of the textile and other industries.
The question of who bears responsibility for unsafe working conditions in factories that produce goods for sale outside
In a country that so explicitly entertains a double standard with respect to philosophical ideals such as values, it hardly
"Made in China" - three simple words we Americans have become accustomed to seeing every day on products from Char-Broil
There is an unfortunate parallel between the imperialist colonization of former periods in history and the present day economic
View All Articles on:
What is the responsibility of American companies and consumers for unsafe working conditions in Chinese factories?
Add your voice
Know something about What is the responsibility of American companies and consumers for unsafe working conditions in Chinese factories??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT)
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Br...more
hide