Channel Button

There are 17 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #14 by Helium's members.

Sports & Recreation   >

Sports & Recreation (Other)

Get a Widget for this title

Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

Twenty20 is an absolute revelation for the world of cricket.

It has appeal to a wider spectrum of people, I know people who aren't cricket fans but love the party atmosphere that Twenty20 creates. I think that the shortened version of the game also quite a dangerous thing as well.

In England, the county scene is absolutely saturated with fixtures (County Championship, Pro 40, C&G Trophy and Twenty20 games). Not only is it tough on the players to be playing 5 or 6 days a week, it's also extremely difficult to adjust between the rather sedate scoring of the Championship games and the slog-fest that Twenty20 has become. I have played 20 and 24 over games myself and the mindset of attacking is difficult to adjust to after playing over 3 or 4 days. It is slowly having an effect on the English game.

We are now seeing players like Luke Wright of Sussex becoming a 'Twenty20 specialist', that can't honestly be good for someone of Wright's age. It is also further proof that cricket is moving closer to football, where we are searching for the next youngster that we can thrust into an unnecessary spotlight.

The financial implications of Twenty20 are the only thing that the counties actually embraces, more bums on seats means more money for them. And, let's face it, after New Road was flooded last summer, you can see how much it cost Worcestershire to miss out on 4 games of Twenty20. I would hate to see this exciting version of the game become a purely revenue-based decision to keep it on the schedule.

I would love to see fixture lists to incorporate some Twenty20 games at international level. Can you imagine Australia and England at the MCG playing Twenty20? That would be absolutely incredible.

Twenty20 is a good thing for entertainment seekers and a bad thing for the cricket purists. If this is the only way to keep cricket thriving then I have no problems with this game but I would hate to see Test matches sacrificed to create more space for Twenty20.

Learn more about this author, Stephen Culley.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

  • 1 of 17

    by Aj Brady

    Twenty20 cricket is an interesting concept, however at the end of the day, it comes a distant third behind Test Match cricket

    read more

  • 2 of 17

    by Malcolm Toogood

    It is no surprise to see the old chestnuts being trotted-out as soon as any discussion begins on the merits, or otherwise,

    read more

  • 3 of 17

    by Phil Hill

    You just have to look at the spectator figures to appreciate how successful the Twenty20 cricket games have been since their

    read more

  • 4 of 17

    by Spartan Sense

    The future of cricket as a TRUE world sport lies in 20/20 cricket. At the moment there are 10 test playing nations and Zimbabwe's

    read more

  • 5 of 17

    by Kimberte William

    Twenty20 cricket is here to stay. There is no stopping this shorter, more electric and captivating form of the game. Cricket

    read more

View All Articles on:
Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon?

Add your voice

Know something about Is the new 'Twenty20' cricket version a curse or a boon??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Why is skating so popular?

Click for your side.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA