11 of 88

Write now Article Tools

Page 2 of 17

made by one side only the greens'. This is because the greens have more clout in the media than scientists who wish to discuss the matter scientifically according to research protocol. A U.S. survey showed that most academics and journalists are leftist', socialistic, and totalitarian in their activities. They openly admit to suppressing information that is contrary to their own, rather than go through the bother of being shown the error of their ways and explaining their myths. No wonder the public are unaware that green claims are hotly refuted because they are not scientific! In truth, there is no consensus' about global warming, or climate change.

There is no actual, replicable way for global warming environmentalists or scientists to prove their claims! It all relies on guesswork and numbers punched into a computer program, because there is no way anyone can replicate weather! "Scientists say it, so it must be true". The fact that they cannot prove any part of their claims, and that many scientists disagree, is sidelined. That is the only reason Al Gore got away with his Nobel Peace Prize! It is about time we had a non-warming version of the IPCC report, to show the strength of opposition to its claims.

There are no scientific proofs for global warming'. But there is plenty of proof that different parts of the northern hemisphere are experiencing changes in temperature. The temperature changes in each of these northern areas is different and very small and is just normal. The southern hemisphere has no such experiences. Therefore, there is no such thing as global warming'! And even where there is a rise in temperature, it is counted to be so insignificant (to the right of the decimal point) as to be not worth recording! As for warming caused by human beings there is no evidence for this. You might think it is true, but this is only because of constant repetition in the media.

The facts' and examples given for global warming' are not examples of it at all. They are just examples of ordinary changes in temperature. Some are examples of cyclical changes say every 50 or 100 years or so, but warmist scientists do not tell the public that, because it does not suit their alarmist stance.

Recent bad weather examples are not unusual, as claimed; they are ordinary changes known to the earth for millennia. But they are being foisted on the people as extraordinary and indicative of some major disaster. And people are being duped by it, big time! Ask anyone and they

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• ...
• 17
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Global warming: What's the real truth??
We want to hear your view. Write now!