There are 81 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #4 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Agree | 50% | 744 votes | Total: 1488 votes | |
| Disagree | 50% | 744 votes |
When I was a child living in a large city, buses ran up and down the major streets of the city at very regular intervals. I remember my older sister taking me on a bus to a downtown movie theater to watch Walt Disney's "Song of the South." The year was 1947, I was six, and the bus ride cost my sister a dime each way.
Whoever provides the services of public transportation has expenses that must be met.
Equipment. Personnel. Maintenance. Fuel. None of these items are inexpensive.
The real question is not whether public transportation should be free, but rather how should the general public pay for it. There are three options.
Public transportation could be paid for by charging appropriate fares to users of the service. The more people who use the service, the cheaper, to a point, the fares could be.
Public transportation could be paid for by charging appropriate fares to users and by subsidizing the service through taxes. Again, the greater the usage by the general public, the less dependence there would need to be on tax subsidization.
Public transportation could be paid for entirely by taxes. This would make the service appear to be free to users. But, of course, it can never be free. They would simply pay for it in increased taxes.
No matter which system is used to finance public transportation, we, the consumers, the taxpayers, supply the revenue that supports the system.
Traditionally, a combination of fares and subsidies from general tax revenues have been used to finance the system. This is arguably the best way to pay for public transportation.
If I were six today and my older sister wanted to take me downtown, she would not take me on a bus. She would drive me there in her car, using expensive gas, polluting the atmosphere and paying a premium for parking space. This is the real problem. Most of us are not interested in using public transportation. We would rather use our gas guzzling cars to get us from here to there.
Which presents another challenge. Why should taxpayers pay for a system they do not want to use? Make public transportation convenient, comfortable and inexpensive (not free), and its existence could be justified. Then maybe someone's older sister would be willing to take her little brother downtown on a bus.
Learn more about this author, Tom Parsons.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
I'm puzzled by the whole concept that public transportation should be free. Nothing is free. Everything is paid for b...read more
by Jeff Vidrine
Public transportation is defined as those transportation systems run, managed, and financed by a governmental agency....read more
by Jack Davis
One of the largest barriers to sustainability in Canada is the use of motor vehicles as a primary means to get around...read more
I am a 47-year old man who rejected the norm of possessing and utilizing a privately owned, fossil-fueled motor vehic...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Public transportation should be free ?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
The MAGIC Foundation for children's growth
Major Aspects of Growth In Children (MAGIC) is made up of 25,000+ families whose children (and affected adults) have ...more
hide