Channel Button

There are 80 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #4 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Travel   >

Public Transportation

Get a Widget for this title

Public transportation should be free

Results so far:

Agree
52% 933 votes Total: 1803 votes
Disagree
48% 870 votes

When I was a child living in a large city, buses ran up and down the major streets of the city at very regular intervals. I remember my older sister taking me on a bus to a downtown movie theater to watch Walt Disney's "Song of the South." The year was 1947, I was six, and the bus ride cost my sister a dime each way.

Whoever provides the services of public transportation has expenses that must be met. Equipment. Personnel. Maintenance. Fuel. None of these items are inexpensive.

The real question is not whether public transportation should be free, but rather how should the general public pay for it. There are three options.

Public transportation could be paid for by charging appropriate fares to users of the service. The more people who use the service, the cheaper, to a point, the fares could be.

Public transportation could be paid for by charging appropriate fares to users and by subsidizing the service through taxes. Again, the greater the usage by the general public, the less dependence there would need to be on tax subsidization.

Public transportation could be paid for entirely by taxes. This would make the service appear to be free to users. But, of course, it can never be free. They would simply pay for it in increased taxes.

No matter which system is used to finance public transportation, we, the consumers, the taxpayers, supply the revenue that supports the system.

Traditionally, a combination of fares and subsidies from general tax revenues have been used to finance the system. This is arguably the best way to pay for public transportation.

If I were six today and my older sister wanted to take me downtown, she would not take me on a bus. She would drive me there in her car, using expensive gas, polluting the atmosphere and paying a premium for parking space. This is the real problem. Most of us are not interested in using public transportation. We would rather use our gas guzzling cars to get us from here to there.

Which presents another challenge. Why should taxpayers pay for a system they do not want to use? Make public transportation convenient, comfortable and inexpensive (not free), and its existence could be justified. Then maybe someone's older sister would be willing to take her little brother downtown on a bus.

Learn more about this author, Tom Parsons.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Public transportation should be free

Disagree
  • 1 of 45

    by Keith Hamburger

    Public transportation, or mass transit, should be free. Not free of cost to riders but free from government interference

    read more

  • 2 of 45

    by Lostinchina

    Free public transport? That is an oxymoron if ever there was one. If the user does not pay, where will the funding come from

    read more

Agree

Add your voice

Know something about Public transportation should be free ?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

224344

Featured Partner

Society of Professional Journalists

Helium is proud to announce its partnership with the Society of Professional Journalists. Its members (almost 10,000 ...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA