There are 403 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #121 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 57% | 2409 votes | Total: 4255 votes | |
| No | 43% | 1846 votes |
There are many ways in which this once God-fearing country has excluded God and the Bible from places where they should rightfully be, such as removing the Ten Commandments from courthouses. However, using the Bible in a way in which it should not be used is just as problematic. The simple truth is that using the Bible as part of an oath-swearing ceremony is in opposition to what the Bible itself says. Consider this:
"But above all things, my brothers, don't swear, neither by heaven, nor by the earth, nor by any other oath; but let your 'yes' be 'yes,' and your 'no,' 'no'; so that you don't fall into hypocrisy." James 5:12 (HNV)
James is quoting and summarizing Christ himself speaking in Matthew 5:33-37. In other words, it is hypocrisy practiced at the highest levels of government to use the Bible in this way, and unfortunately, has been from the beginning. George Washington himself set the precedent of being sworn in on the Bible, and most presidents have continued the tradition. He may have thought it showed respect for the truth of the Bible and the responsibility of his office, but it does not.
Furthermore, while the early Presidents may have truly respected the Bible, while simultaneously not having read it carefully enough, the country today has much less respect for it. Criminals and Presidents alike are called to make oaths upon it, and which is more likely to keep their oath? Most criminals do not even believe in the truth of the Bible, or they probably would not have committed their crimes. How disrespectful and ultimately meaningless it is to have someone who does not even respect the Bible as truth make an oath on it, when it says not to do such a thing in the first place.
Ultimately, whether someone tells the truth in a trial or fulfills the office of President with justice and honor is a matter of his own principles, not whether he has made a particular gesture, sworn a particular oath, or put his hand on a particular book. A Bible is not a substitute for the presence of God. This is not to say that criminals should not be made to promise to speak truth, as a reminder that that is the right thing to do. It does not mean that Presidents should not be made to promise to fulfill their office well. However, those promises should be made like a marriage vow, truthfully, before God, but not as an oath upon a Bible. Let's take the Bibles out of ceremonies where they do not belong and put them in the hands of citizens and judges so that the nation may become law-abiding and God-fearing once more.
Learn more about this author, Reiko Yukawa.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Let's face it: the separation of church and state in America can be confusing as all get-out. Just when you think you've
by Melba Dagan
This country was founded by men who believed in God and held the Bible in reverence as the word of God. The use of the Bible
Add your voice
Know something about Should the Bible continue to be used for swearing-in ceremonies and in courtrooms??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a ca...more
hide