There are 88 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #4 by Helium's members.
Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| No | 60% | 654 votes | Total: 1082 votes | |
| Yes | 40% | 428 votes |
Is it morally okay to wear fur? Well, let's see: Do you wear leather shoes? A leather belt? I don't see many people running around in canvas sneakers, not even the vegetarians I know. Well, the vegans, yes, but don't they know that while they are being compulsive about mankind sure they don't kill an animal for any purpose they are causing a crisis in the vegetable world? All of those massacred ears of corn. All of those fields stripped of nutrients as they consume more rice, and those poor rice plants! Okay, okay, I'm getting carried away.
Is it morally wrong to wear fur? If it's morally wrong to use animal life for fur, than it's morally wrong to use ANY living thing to sustain yourself, plants included. Follow the "fur is immoral" logic to its full conclusion, and you will just have to sit on the sidewalk and starve.
I think I'm going to start a "Save the Fruits and Vegetables" campaign. No one cares about the carrots, the apples or the bananas anymore. People think up a million reasons that they will eat cheese but not meat, or they will eat chicken beef but not chicken, or they will eat any meat but they won't wear fur, or they won't wear fur but they also won't make sure none of their property contains any leather. Where is the logic in that? Where is the morality in when no one is decrying the plight of the peas?
Oh, you may say that vegetation is not as precious as animal life. But who are you to make that moral conclusion?
Now, let's look at fur again. A fur could come from a wild animal that lived a natural life in the wild before a hunter took it down. But that leather came from a poor cow who either trudged her way into the milking parlor until her milk production went down and she was culled from the herd. A fur could come from a farmer of mink whose livelihood depends on his proper care of the animals. Either way, you can't say that fur is immoral while consuming or using anything that is or once was composed of living cells.
So you go to synthetic everything, hoping to save all the plants and animals. I hate to tell you but every synthetic creation of man has a negative impact on the environment, meaning that its byproducts and waste will eventually be killing a plant, an animal or a human being.
Is fur immoral? Then anything that gives you food, shelter or clothing is immoral. Abstain from it all and you won't be with the rest of us long.
Learn more about this author, Joshua Keyes DVM.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Humans are omnivorous, it is natural for us to consume both animals and plants. We have become the most successful and feared
"BYE BABY BUNTING
DADDY'S GONE A-HUNTING
GONE TO FETCH A RABBIT SKIN
TO WRAP HIS BABY BUNTING IN"
[and mummy made a great stew!]
Does
Wearing fur is not morally OK because of the extreme cruelty to animals and the degradation of our environment caused by
by Sans Souci
It is never ok to wear fur. Wearing fur is not necessary for humans. We have been wearing fur simply for fashion, and fashion
Add your voice
Know something about Is it morally OK to wear fur??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT)
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Br...more
hide