Channel Button

There are 27 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #10 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

War in Iraq

Is the use of torture as an interrogation technique ever justified?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

No
62% 143 votes Total: 232 votes
Yes
38% 89 votes

I am willing to give you a flat unequivocal no to this question. Torture as an interrogation technique is never "Justified".

Now I will put you in a hypothetical situation. A child had been kidnapped and is being held in danger of their life. You have in front of you one of the people who did it and that person could tell you where that child is. You are working under a severe time shortage. Would you resort to torture to gain the location of that child? No? Well what if it were your child?

Me? If in that place, I judged that I had a perpetrator in front of me, and a child in danger of dying shortly, that man is about to have a very rough and torturous few minutes until he gives me that child's location.

Would I be right to do it? No. But I would face my bosses, a jury of my peers and God if necessary for my sins in this matter before I would stand sinless and pure while a child died.

That hypothetical is meant to point out that sometimes situations do not allow you to come down with a morally correct answer, particularly out there on the sharp end of the spear. Sometimes you just have to decide which horror you are willing to share your midnights and your George Dickel with.

Again, I am saying that torture can never be justified, meaning made just, and writing it into public policy is not only unjustified it is an abomination. Policy in this context, means what we intend to do in every day situations, it means what we support and what we want to be when we are at our best. I think, in all things, our policy should reflect our principles.

So how do I reconcile my stand on the child molester and my stand against torture? You need to understand I judge these things from the point of view of a former field operator. A field operator knows that no plan survives initial contact with the enemy. The same thing can apply to policy.

And, as a former field operator, I will tell you also that if it falls on me to commit an abomination that risks my immortal soul, I would really rather be doing it in the name of principles and a people that are better than what I am doing.

Writing torture into public policy makes that doubtful.

Learn more about this author, Edward Hall.
Contact this writer Click here to send author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Is the use of torture as an interrogation technique ever justified?

No
  • 1 of 16

    by Gerhard Adam

    While many of the discussions focus on the legalities or morality of torture, the answer to this question is actually...read more

  • 2 of 16

    by Tanilan Prescott

    Ever heard the phrase "Don't stoop to their level?" I'm sure most of us have. When torture is used as a tactic to g...read more

Yes
  • 1 of 11

    by Bill Stone

    Before we can have informed discourse regarding torture, we must be able to define it. We already have an idea of wh...read more

  • 2 of 11

    by Rex Coker

    When I think of the people that died in the twin towers in New York . I ask my self if this type of interrogation tec...read more

Add your voice

Know something about Is the use of torture as an interrogation technique ever justified??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA