Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > Politics in Africa

Should the US take greater action in regards to Darfur?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

No
39% 156 votes Total: 399 votes
Yes
61% 243 votes

by Harvey Stelman

Created on: December 01, 2007

Should the US take greater action in regards to Darfur? Why is it that those that want us out of Iraq, want us in Darfur? Is that not contradictory for those that say; "we must protect the troops!" Going into Darfur with military troops will lead to a further massacre of Darfur's innocent people. The sadistic Sudanese troops, and Muslim extremists will kill as many people as possible before the American troops get there. Does this remind you of Germany at the end of the war? Gee, now we don't have to worry about feeding them, we can save money!

Once more the United States will end up in a guerrilla war. We can take out their Federal Government very easily, but do we want to be a colonial power? The UN, don't be silly. They will use our money, and send over sight seeing troops. The African Union should be the one to help! What have they ever helped? Just about every government in Africa is very corrupt. We give, they take. But the people that need get nothing.

There is only one way to help. We do need to send in troops, but they should oversee the generous goods being delivered. The Sudanese government should not be the one to distribute anything. If they do, they will never get to the ones that were supposed to get them.

I have many friend's from Africa that come from different countries, and they all say the same thing. "The government is corrupt-corrupt-corrupt!" Has Africa contributed anything of necessity that you can remember? My mind is like that of an Ostrich.

Shall we discuss the war? It is not like like the war in Iraq. Terrorism is not at the bottom of the conflict. We are not going to fight Al-Queda, although they will try to get involved. As I am told by my African friend's, the war is tribal, and about religion. Most people in the US don't want to get involved in a civil war. Darfur is a true civil war. Ask the British teacher that let her class choose the name Mohammad for a stuffed animal.

There can only be one law if the Muslims have their way. So do we send our troops in to keep Christianity alive in Darfur? That is the real question? Is this going to be the start of a CRUSADE? I predicted there would be a Crusade two years ago that would take place in the next decade. This is as good a place to start as any.

The Muslims have been on the attack for quite some time. Lets be honest, not politically correct. How far are we going to permit them to expand, before we do the obvious? This can only happen with the use of our troops. But we have to fight to win! You don't use your military to start another Korea, or Viet Nam. You use the military to achieve victory. In simple English, bomb the hell out of them! There will be civilian casualties of course, but what do our opponents care about civillian casualties. We destroyed Japan, Germany, etc. Are they not our friend's now?

If we don't do the job correctly, don't do it. I don't think our country is ready, and willing to take the action necessary in Darfur.

Learn more about this author, Harvey Stelman.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Featured Partner

Catalyst Music inc

more


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA