There are 6 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| No | 51% | 37 votes | Total: 72 votes | |
| Yes | 49% | 35 votes |
Was the US Supreme Court right to allow manufacturers and distributors to create resale price agreements? Well, it was a 5 - 4 decision so there must be good argument for both sides of the opinion, with a slight edge supporting the affirmative.
Please consider the following point of view that agrees with the majority vote of the US Supreme Court.
First of all it should be noted that the ruling does not give free reign to any manufacturer to restrain trade or fix prices. Justices Breyer, Souter, Ginsburg and Stevens dissented because they worried about 96 years of precedent - what happens to all of that earlier legal advice and rulings that were decided using that precedent? If strict precedent were to be ignored in this case, how would that endanger the reliability of precedent in future cases? Serious concerns, but not focused upon the matter of free trade and price fixing - the court agrees that such practices are still illegal.
There remains a test of reason that all manufacturers are obliged to meet when they implement any price agreement, expressed or implied, with their distribution channels. The majority opinion simply makes much needed room for the 'proper' use of these agreements and puts considerable weight in favor of those that increase competition and keep prices low to the consumer for the long term, instead of operating purely for the short term.
Justice Kennedy, in writing the majority opinion, pointed to the volumes of current economic literature that justifies the use of resale price agreements as a pro-competitive tactic. He also illustrated that second-best alternatives usually add cost and risk to the manufacturer, leading to the eventual price increase at the consumer level.
The argument in favor of allowing resale price agreements, when it can be demonstrated as beneficial to business and consumers, is compelling. It gives manufacturers the freedom to practice under a sensible business model and does nothing to prevent the vigorous prosecution of those perverting the system.
Copy and paste this link to your browser for a detailed legal analysis of this issue.
www.metrocorpcounsel.com /current.php?artType=view&artM onth=November&artYear=2007&Ent ryNo=7284
Learn more about this author, Ken Reetz.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Ken Reetz
Was the US Supreme Court right to allow manufacturers and distributors to create resale price agreements? Well, it was a
by David Janke
While it may seem that this ruling hurts consumers, the concern of the court is constitutionality and law, not necessarily
Add your voice
Know something about Was the US Supreme Court right to allow manufacturers and distributors to create resale price agreements??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Nature's Voice Our Choice's mission is to preserve, conserve, and restore water resources in communities throughout t...more
hide