5 of 21

Write now Article Tools

Page 3 of 4

truth) In other words, in this area, we really can't say if bears are decreasing. Now isn't that nice to get the whole picture instead of a fear filled, panicking headline of lies?

Once again, compare that to, The Washington Posts headline. "Two-thirds of the world's polar bears WILL BE KILLED off by 2050 and the entire population gone from Alaska because of thinning sea ice from global warming in the Arctic, government scientists forecast Friday." (emphasis added) to highlight the emotion driving words and the lie. That's just the Post, other media were equally or more ridiculous.

Let me tell you of something you NEVER see attached to these reports. In a Cambridge study called "Artic Climate Impact Assessment" now considered one of the most used guides for Arctic climate in the world, they say; "Polar bears are unlikely to survive as a species if there is an almost complete loss of summer sea ice cover, which is projected to occur before the end of this century by some climate models." Just for the sake of this argument we will ignore the "ifs, the unlikely, the almost, and especially the "projected" and the "some" or "models." Even though this statement is clogged up with those conjectures we will save them some time in their model making and just tell the truth., Rest assured, Mr. Scientist, the ice WILL melt, the temps WILL rise, because we knew before you wasted millions of dollars on this study that it happens all the time.

From the early 1900s to mid 1950s the artic melted. The only problem we have to answer is, how did the Polar bears survive that melt down, and the one in the 19th century and yet cannot survive this next one? I can answer that for you. We were not up there infesting the land with our scientist's "theories," creating panic back home, therefore, no one knows what they did. But we do know, they survived! Just like they are going to survive this time. Unless of course, some scientist gets a hair brained idea to save them, that ends up destroying them. Something else to consider; if it is our "recent" greenhouse gas production causing this rise in temperature, what caused it in the nineteen hundreds, and the century before that? In fact, now that we have found primitive tools in the dirt, under this melted ice region dating back centuries, what chemical and oil industries did those cavemen have that caused that tragedy? You know I like many of the suggestions of other scientists that Mr. Derocher calls "fanciful." One said, she figured

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about How polar bears are affected by global warming?
We want to hear your view. Write now!