Channel Button

There are 16 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.

Politics, News & Issues   >

Terrorism

Should governments negotiate with terrorists?

When a person is abducted and held hostage for ransom, or when a building or entire region is threatened with destruction, it can be tempting for would-be heroes to negotiate with the terrorists and comply with their demands to ensure that their civilian targets remain unharmed. One wants, of course, to "talk down" an insane person from committing rash acts; this should be distinguished from serious negotiations, which are the subject here.

In the heat of the moment, saving the innocent at all costs may seem like the only moral thing to do. However, such heroism comes with a steep price. The payment conceded to one terrorist group may encourage others to extort similar concessions by the use of similar criminal acts.

Furthermore, where an individual might quickly cave into the demands of an oppressor, a government is expected to have sufficient military backing to remain standing. A government that quickly retreats from a standoff with a small group of people may be perceived by other nations as weak, insecure, or incompetent. This may harm its foreign relations and future negotiations of all kinds.

A government has no need to negotiate with significantly weaker, more vulnerable terrorists-for example, lone, crazed gunmen or isolated cults. More threatening terrorist groups, such as organized militia, might actually rival the government's power, but the government is still probably better off assuming an air of confidence and assuming that the militia will not call its bluff. However, if the government knows that its population is at the mercy of a terrorist group distinctly more powerful than itself-for example, a group with multiple nuclear weapons-and if the situation is unlikely ever to repeat itself, it might be more advantageous for the government and for the people it serves to engage in formal negotiations to deflect a major threat.

Learn more about this author, Tucker Lieberman.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should governments negotiate with terrorists?

  • 1 of 16

    by Gerard MP

    The majority of the world go to work and earn money to pay for their lifestyle, the week to most of us require gettin... read more

  • 2 of 16

    by Tucker Lieberman

    When a person is abducted and held hostage for ransom, or when a building or entire region is threatened with destruc... read more

  • 3 of 16

    by Michael Austin

    There is a primary change in the definition of terrorists that has occurred over the last ten years. Prior the first ... read more

  • 4 of 16

    by Aldo Bonincontro

    I think that a State mustn't negotiate with terrorists, for not giving a political legitimation to them and to what t... read more

  • 5 of 16

    by Michael Feek

    No government should negotiate with terrorists. Terrorists only see their own agenda so negotiations do little to res... read more

View All Articles on:
Should governments negotiate with terrorists?

Add your voice

Know something about Should governments negotiate with terrorists??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

What do you know about?
  • Tell us! Get published today.
  • Reach millions.
  • Many ways to earn.
Join Helium Today

Already a member? Log in.

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Should AFRICOM, the new US military HQ in Africa, be based in Djibouti or Liberia?

Click for your side. Must be logged in.

90554

Featured Partner

The Sunlight Foundation

Founded in January 2006, the mission of the Sunlight Foundation is to strengthen the relationship between lawmakers a...more

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA