1 of 17

Write now Article Tools

I tend to think that they are. I would counter the argument for those who fill that it is a justified practice, to take into consideration a number of convicted individuals on death row who have had their convictions overturned. Primarily in regard to DNA testing, and the use of such technology in reversing a more than substantial number of these convictions. This being the case, as it is fact and well documented. Consider if you well, that this technology has not been around but for a few decades now. Moreover, we can logically conclude that prior to such technical advances that errors in judgement have occured in the past. With that in mind who can say what technologies of tomorrow wont be discovered, and made application of in regard to forensics? I take it that since none of us to my knowledge have the unchaining ability to gaze into the future. That a person of common since and absolute logic, would have to conclude that we have in fact in the past, and that more over in today's justice which has no absolute guarantee of absolution, have put the innocent to death on more than a number of occasions.

Putting an innocent or guilty individual to death is murder plane and simple, like it or not! More over I find such cognitive decadent and analytical reasoning that is simply going to take and attempt to make an argument to the contrary, on the pretext and context using a none tangible illustration of the death penalty and ones being convicted initially as it were. Offer up a oscillatory dichotomy of comparisons as it relates to that of a kidnapping to being equivocally logically to the incarceration of the conviction of the crime there of, to be highly flawed in there reason. Moreover I'd offer to such ones in counter arguments by posing the following analytical conceptualization in respect to their very deeply flawed and ignomatic illustration. A kidnapper might it is reasonable to assume be found not guilty somewhere down the road. Just as anyone might quite possibly be found not guilty and be granted an acquittal of sorts, in regard to any number of criminal acts. In the case of such ones, it is possible to make a wrong righted. is it not?! With this in mind than. I pose the following question; Is it possible if hypothetically, one is to be found not guilty of an infraction, (say murder), just for the record, be reversed so as to right the wrong after capital punishment is conducted in respect to the convicted. Even though later evidence supports that

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Deciding whether those who pass the death penalty are murderers, too?
We want to hear your view. Write now!