11 of 15

Yes

Write now Article Tools

More often than not, creationism is founded in religious ideas. Often interpreting their own religion's word literally. The idea of taking the words of a two thousand year old book, interpreting the ideas literally, as creationists then apply these ideas to modern culture and knowledge is dumbfounding. As creationists continue to argue that science, and specifically evolution is founded in theory and faith, and is therefore invalid is completely hypocritical as their entire argument is based on religious faith. The extreme dogmatism which these individuals hold within their arguments is all which allows them to argue. Regardless of how many scientific proofs are presented, if the ideas do not support the creationist view, then the idea is not valid. Creationists have a bad habit of having a selective view of reality. If a piece of science is somewhat contradictory to evolutionist theory, they will attempt to disprove all science by doing so. For example animal A did not evolve into animal C for they are too different, the one organism that appears to be a transitional animal in animal B is in fact its own organism having nothing to do with animals A and C. To disprove science by using false science, and therefore negating the legitimacy of science. Creationists have no valid arguments. So please, any creationists out there, give me a non hypocritical argument founded somewhere outside of faith and the "oh but look how infinitely complex this organism is!". Thanks.

Learn more about this author, Sam Weissman.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Add your voice

Know something about Did dinosaurs evolve into birds??
We want to hear your view. Write now!