There are 7 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.
'Dawn Of The Dead' is a zombie film centred around a shopping mall. Whilst George A. Romero's 1978 original is more of a social satire than anything else, Zack Snyder's 2004 version was much more of an intense action horror. To compare the two different versions is to be a difficult task as I enjoyed both of the two films but for different reasons. The original film was the first zombie film I ever witnessed and for that reason will always hold a special place in my heart, however the remake was also a film I found to be greatly appealing.
What I love about the original is that not only is it a great social satire, but is also an excellent zombie film in itself. There is a great element of gore in this film and suspense is built up throughout the film right up until its climax. I found the storyline to be greatly entertaining, and the mall location that had been chosen as the setting greatly appealing. What stood out about this film more so than in the remake was the characterisation of our main protagonists here. Whereas in the remake there are quite a large amount of characters to take in, the original has only four that we follow throughout much of the film. As there are less characters to focus on; I feel that we get to know the four more so than we get to know the characters we are introduced to in the remake. There is always much debate when films are remade, and people tend to side with the original and before the remake was released I was gearing myself up to do just that. I love the original 'Dawn Of The Dead' and was disgusted when I heard news that it was to be remade as I envisaged my favourite zombie flick of all time being ruined.
In a sense however it could perhaps be seen that the 2004 remake of 'Dawn Of The Dead' was 'better' than the original in that it had strong production values, a cracking cast, and fast moving and therefore more entertaining to watch zombies. The original film was a sequel to 'Night of the Living Dead' and therefore it followed on that the zombies moved slowly like in the first film, however the remake chose to break away from this and in some ways I feel it benefited from doing so as fast zombies are far more entertaining to watch than slow moving in the way that they are far more unpredictable. The casting for the remake I feel was extremely well chosen as all those involved put in great performances in their roles, whereas in the original watching the film back today I feel that some of the performances were
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Marq Mosier
George A. Romero's 1978 film Dawn of the Dead is widely considered to be not only a feat of makeup and special effect... read more
'Dawn Of The Dead' is a zombie film centred around a shopping mall. Whilst George A. Romero's 1978 original is more o... read more
by Kim Latham
Dawn of the Dead, one of my favorite movies of all times. As a teenager, I loved the original one that was made by G... read more
The first time I seen the first "Dawn of the Dead", I loved it. I'm into zombie movies, but it still freaks me out kn... read more
Comparing the two versions of "Dawn of the Dead" is like comparing apples and tomatoes. They are both red on the out... read more
View All Articles on:
Dawn of the Dead: the 1978 classic versus the 2004 adaptation
Add your voice
Know something about Dawn of the Dead: the 1978 classic versus the 2004 adaptation?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
The Goldwater Institute was founded in 1988 by a small group of entrepreneurial Arizonans with the blessing of Senato...more
hide