Home > Pets & Animals > Animal Rights & Issues
Created on: October 11, 2007 Last Updated: September 10, 2009
There's nothing like seeing animals in their natural setting: stately giraffes and elephants undulating across the plain; herds of wildebeest on their migratory route; grouchy-looking ostriches and secretary birds; lions basking in the branches of trees; a chorus line of flamingos taking off into the sky; hyenas tearing apart the remains of a lion's prey; a curious Cape buffalo approaching too close for comfort. All these memories and many more are still with me. Back in the 70s, during a Peace Corps stint in East Africa, I visited Marsabit , Tsavo , Lakes Manyara and Nakuru , Serengeti, and Ngorongoro Crater, among other wildlife parks, on my summer break.
Before that period, the only places I'd observed exotic animals up close-in a most unnatural habitat, the zoo-were in New York, Colorado, and California. Although I've always been attracted to animals of all kinds and used to make a point of visiting the zoos of big cities as well as smaller towns, I always came away with a wistful feeling for them and all they were missing as exhibit animals, locked away for life in cages, or separated from the public by deep, wide moats. But in those days I believed the hype that zoos were enlightened places where education, research, and preservation of endangered and exotic species took place, and that sacrificing a few wild animals in the pursuit of more knowledge to help save the others was a necessary evil.
Unfortunately, the truth is that even the best run and most well-planned zoos are simply prisons for wild animals. And most zoos are far from well run, because of a chronic lack of funding for improvements. In the smaller zoos, which include roadside menageries and petting zoos, animals are forced to spend their lives in a cold, sterile environment, walking on concrete, behind steel bars. They are exposed to extreme heat and cold, and travel from town to town in cramped containers. If they're lucky, they may receive some level of veterinary care and regular feeding. But often they don't.
Even the large modern zoos such as the San Diego Zoo can hardly provide a natural environment for all their animals, which come from varied climates all over the planet. Observing the normal behavior of these animals in a zoo environment is a joke. They cannot hunt, mate, or socialize the way they would in the wild. Animals who normally live in extended families or large herds may find themselves with at most one or two or three others of their kind. There is no privacy and very
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The debate around zoos and captive animals
by Adam Thorn
There are many pros and cons surrounding zoos and captive animals. In the 19th century, the condition animals were kept
by M. Sparga
Most people cannot afford an African safari or a trip to the Amazon flooded forest. But they can afford a ticket to the
Should zoos be banned? Pictures of a full grown lion pacing back and forth in his bare twelve foot cage is a zoo of the
The purpose of the modern zoo in American society is to propagate endangered species and to educate the public about animals
First, before I launch into this, I would like to say that I work for a South East Asian based wildlife rescue centre and
View All Articles on: The debate around zoos and captive animals
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should all pets have microchips implanted to help prevent getting lost
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
International Human Rights Group
IHRG Mission Statement: Standing for Religious Liberties for All We believe that religious liberties are the foundation of human rights for any civilized society. Governments, however, have not always respected this most foundation...more