Channel Button

There are 41 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #19 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

US Elections (Other)

Get a Widget for this title

Should the US government help fund election campaigns?

Results so far:

Yes
30% 131 votes Total: 438 votes
No
70% 307 votes

by Tj Sly

Over burdened budgets and continuously rising taxes should be a clear signal that the US government is already overextended and should not help fund election campaigns. This combined with the constant call for campaign finance reforms speak volumes about the difficulties regulating campaign finance. To actually question whether or not government should finance election campaigns should be a clear and resounding "No!"

Want to hear about local and national governmental budget problems? Just turn on any television or radio and listen to the news. Economy slow downs weigh on banks and mortgage companies usually insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The defense budget is over burdened and requires near constant expanding, money taken from other social programs and increased taxes. Fortune 500 companies send American jobs to China, Ireland, Spain, and countries that will deliver the products for less cost to the company causing higher unemployment rates. Just recently the state of Michigan faced a governmental shutdown because the budget could not be balanced.

Think about the candidates you support. Would you want the government to hand funds over to their opponents? For government campaign election funding to be fair every candidate would have to receive the same amount of funding regardless of their party affiliation. These are your tax dollars how many more would you like to spend? How would it be funded? Should state or federal taxes pay for it? Would it be fair for one to pay and not the other?

Which campaigns would be funded? It would not be fair to only fund national campaigns. If state campaigns are included it would not be fair to exclude local campaigns. The potential for costs to skyrocket out of control with the issue of governmental campaign election finance are exponential. The system for campaign finance that is in place clearly has flaws. To replace it with governmental funding would be like having a hungry fox to protect your hen house while you pay for the losses.

Learn more about this author, Tj Sly.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should the US government help fund election campaigns?

No
  • 1 of 23

    by Lorie Grant DeWorken

    The US government should NOT help fund election campaigns. It would only make the problem worse!

    Without a doubt, current

    read more

  • 2 of 23

    by Chad Morgan

    The United States Government is one that is very unique. It is so unique that just about every new country ie. Iraq has tried

    read more

Yes
  • 1 of 18

    by Matthew J. Geiger

    Elections are the bread and butter of our Constitutional Democratic Republic. In practice, elections are very expensive,

    read more

  • 2 of 18

    by Kate Johnson

    Not only should the US government help fund election campaigns, the government should provide a fixed and finite medium for

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should the US government help fund election campaigns??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

90554

Featured Partner

The Sunlight Foundation

Founded in January 2006, the mission of the Sunlight Foundation is to strengthen the relationship between lawmakers a...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA