Where Knowledge Rules

Health & Fitness:

Medical Issues

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Should Congress expand existing government health programs to help the uninsured?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

Yes
75% 345 votes Total: 457 votes
No
25% 112 votes

of medical treatments, formulary prescription drugs and a choice of selected participating physicians and pharmacies is NOT a freedom of choice health plan. Folks, when it comes to healthcare, "one-size-fits-all" doesn't cut it. We're a society of individuals with individual needs. We're all being lumped together as numbers and either DENIED coverage based on the medical criteria of others in our same age / social /demographic / socio-economic group, or allowed to PURCHASE ridiculously overpriced healthcare based on the same prejudicial criteria.

In an ideological capitalistic society, no entity or corporation would take advantage of its citizens, but instead, exist solely for the purpose of allowing its citizens to prosper. Realizing, however, that human greed will most always supersede human need, the role of the government in healthcare should be limited to placing percentage-based financial caps concerning profit for large healthcare corporations, and creating laws banning the exclusion of, or exhorbitant price-gouging of coverage regarding pre-existing conditions. Healthcare should be attainable for all Americans and government enforced, not government provided.

That, however, is an ideology not likely to happen. The reality is the insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies and for profit Hospice corporations are too powerful and conveniently in bed with our politicians. They're way too powerful and it's next to impossible to take power away from those already in power without a major upheaval. We've become too dependant on our government for too many things and for the most part, we're afraid to buck the system.

So what's the fix? I don't know, but I do know that it has to start with expanded government regulations, not expanded government provisions.

The next time you have to give an opinion on whether or not the government should expand healthcare programs, stop and think of the ramifications before you answer: Nothing is free. Somebody somewhere will have to pay for it. Will it be you?

243124_m Learn more about this author, Meggie Hardy.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should Congress expand existing government health programs to help the uninsured?

No
  • 1 of 10

    by Meggie Hardy

    There's been a lot of talk about congress expanding existing government health programs to help the uninsured. But is that

    read more

  • 2 of 10

    by Michael Dilger

    As a tax payer, I would like to know how much more of my money is planned to be used to pay for the people that decide not

    read more

Yes
  • 1 of 13

    by Alicia M Prater PhD

    The health care crisis is not only due to a large number of uninsured but also the underinsured. This has come about due

    read more

  • 2 of 13

    by Sandi Crain

    Single-Payer Health Care is the Way to Go

    The United States may have the most expensive health care system in the world

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should Congress expand existing government health programs to help the uninsured??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

102293

Featured Partner

Breakthrough India

Breakthrough India has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Breakthrough's ...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA