7 of 11

Write now Article Tools

After Mourinho what next for Chelsea?...

This question, i suspect, is already being answered by the attitude of the players.

To start at the beginning, i have followed the "progress" of Chelsea from their status pre-Mourinho as a club that competes for honors but never quite had the required push to beat the top clubs like Manchester United and Arsenal. Then came first the billions of the Russian Abrahamovich followed by the "modest" Jose Mourinho.

Mourinho had done the near impossible. Rising from relative obscurity he had won two major competitions in Europe; the most important being the Champions League with Porto. He became a beautiful bride and Chelsea won his signature.

Without doubt Mourinho had done well for himself and Chelsea in three years. Notably he gave the Chelsea faithfuls their first taste of Barclays Premiership after 50 years of waiting. This was where the story really began to show. There are a few factors that have helped to effect a change of guards at Stamford Bridge.

In the first place, Mourinho will find it eternally difficult to prove that he could have won the Barclays League without the billions of Abrahamovich.

Secondly i think Chelsea got themselves a world class coach without looking at the soft issues with the man Jose. Jose had coached a small club where he had done so well. Coming to a bigger club required a change in attitude. Mourinho had classed himself special and needed his ego to be so caressed. But unfortunately the club is run; not by a board, but by a young billionaire who himself needed his ego to be massaged. Conflict was inevitable.

Thirdly, Mourinho was beginning to put in place a system that revolved around him and not the club. Mourinho was more important; in the eyes of the players and even the supporters , than Chelsea. The players seem to play for him and not the Blue they wore. That is bad. Compared to clubs like Manchester United and Arsenal, they needed to put that issue to bed very quickly.

Further, how the many faithfuls of Chelsea could ever think that Abrahamovich would put in so much of "his" personal finance into the club and walk away, allowing others to run the club or him beats me. None of us, would in Roman's shoes do any better. We will always want to "poke" our noses from time to time. A manager needs to understand that.

Finally, Mourinho was beginning to feel the pressure. This was the first season he would be put on a shoe-string budget and he panicked. Throughout last season Mourinho found it had to be magnanimous in defeat and would always attribute his losses to either:

Chelsea did not play well
Referees were bias or
Injuries to key players.

That same song played itself out when they failed to win the Charity Shield.

Lessons for other clubs?

Clubs who are today enjoying foreign investments must realize that sooner or later these billionaires will begin to demand results commensurate with their investment.

What i am waiting for is the reaction of the players. We will know now if they joined Chelsea to be part of a tradition or for the money and/or Jose. My gut feeling is that Jose's exit will signal an exodus from Chelsea. Not because the new man would demand it but because over the past few seasons the club have acquired a set of players who are mercenaries and staunch supporters of the "Special One". That will be bad for Chelsea.

In the long run, Chelsea will be better for losing Jose. The English League will also be better for it. Clubs need passion and modesty; coaches who can lose well and celebrate success with magnanimity; players who are passionate about the clubs they play for and not those who play for the highest pay check.

Time will tell...

Learn more about this author, Adesola Orimalade.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Add your voice

Know something about How will Chelsea cope without Jose Mourinho??
We want to hear your view. Write now!