There are 25 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #9 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 75% | 325 votes | Total: 431 votes | |
| No | 25% | 106 votes |
If the title of this debate were "Does Bob Dylan consider himself a folk singer?" then I would be writing for the other side, because it is a well documented fact that Dylan hates labels. The label that raises his ire the most is being called the "voice of his generation." He's been known to spew venom back at interviewers who broach the subject.
But the truth is, labels need to be placed on things-including art-so that when history is written it can be organized, filed and future generations will have something to go on. Sometimes the future might not agree with what the past labeled something. Four decades ago many people called MLK a traitor, and worse. You'd be hard-pressed to find someone call him that today. We don't give national holidays to traitors.
It might be a stretched analogy, but people used to call Bob Dylan a traitor four decades ago, too. There was the famous cry of "Judas" when he plugged in an electric guitar and played with a band. The folk music purists of the day saw Dylan not only as the Savior of their genre but also as one who might save the world. Naive, to be sure, but his songs were that good. He tapped into the zeitgeist of a burgeoning movement in a way that only a handful of others had in the 20th century. Picasso, Hemingway, Kerouac, their names roll off the tongue without much thought. And when it comes to the 60's so does Dylan's. The early masterpieces still hold up today, not only as near-perfect statements of history, but still relevant. You could sing "Blowing In the Wind," "Masters of War" and "With God On Our Side" at any peace rally today and the lyrics would not sound dated at all. They are timeless.
In between then and now, though, Dylan has gone through many phases. There was the drug-addled, folk-rock stage, the homespun-country stage, the Born Again stage, the I'm-Jewish-again stage, etc.
Through all these transmutations of sound, look and style Dylan always wrote and sang folk songs. The only problem a lot of people had with these changes were the original folk-purists, who see "folk" as a certain type of sound and politics. While Dylan liked the sound-and even bettered it-and liked the humanity behind the politics, he abhorred being their poster-boy. But the themes of his songs have remained the same-railing against power, hatred of war and relationships between men and women.
These are all folk themes. In the 70's he sang "Hurricane" to get a wrongly convicted man out
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The title of this debate has only one side of it right: Bob Dylan as part of American folklore, though not quite a fo...read more
by Phil Dotree
Tying down an artist like Bob Dylan to a single genre is nothing more than a grave mistake for a critic to make. I...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Is Bob Dylan a folk singer??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
Helium has launched a feature that will allow everyone a fun and civil way to discuss and debate all of the issues re...more
hide