1 of 1

Yes

Write now Article Tools

The number of presidential Debates SHOULD be limited to three. The following reason support my conclusion: We watch T.V To past the time, I don't want to turn to ABC trying to catch 'Heros' and instead see a debate. I'm aware some people like to watch debates, but there is no need to air them on five basic channels, that everyone gets. Limit that to one. I believe that since, the presidential electives don't even write their replies, they should only have one. And focus on connecting with the people personally, not through false speeches. The need to show your support for the country is enough to stand up for hours debating, but not enough to write your own speeches? Thats why I don't vote. I will vote when the presidential elective writes his/her own speeches. The right for the most powerful position in the world is not something to come easily. Limiting the debates to only three is even better. They wont be on T.V as much, thus making them HAVE to go out and get personal. Another point to bring up is most electors don't even listen to the other debater's views. Its waiting for your turn to talk, and thats not even an interesting debate.
Thats why the number of presidential debates should be limited to 3.

Learn more about this author, Zach B.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Add your voice

Know something about Should the number of presidential primary debates be limited to three for each party??
We want to hear your view. Write now!