There are 131 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
The death penalty is a very complicated and controversial issue. Some people argue that it is cruel and unethical; some people argue that it is necessary and ought to be a fixed punishment. Both positions are profoundly debatable and extremely difficult for one to take on one position. Therefore, I will argue on behalf of both positions: those who think that it is unethical and should be abolished and those who think that it should remain constant.
Why is capital punishment unethical to some? Why do people make a big deal about it and fight for its abolishment? A few reasons are as follows: (1) man should not be the ultimate decider when one dies; (2) some innocent souls will be wrongly accused and therefore executed; (3) it is cruel and unusual punishment; (4) death sentences are handed down randomly and racially biased.
First of all, opponents claim that those who render the death sentence should not be the ones who determine when a person's life ends; rather, it should be God. In other words, people need to stop playing God. This argument is rather valid because God does not condone the killing of anyone (even though inmates on death row are sentenced there for murder(s) or other crimes), for it is a sin. Those who commit such sin would have to deal with His wrath when their life ends. Thus, why should a controversial practice determine when one dies?
Secondly, opponents argue that some inmates on death row are wrongly accused because they are innocent. Not only is this argument valid, but it is a fact. Those who think otherwise are avoiding the reality; the legal system does not always render proper judgments. In fact, since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1976, more than 100 inmates have been released from Death Row via acquittal, dismissed charges, and of course DNA. With that understanding, it is safe to say that some people who have been executed in the past and present were wrongly executed.
Thirdly, opponents argue that it is a cruel and unusual punishment because people suffer from the various tactics. The electric chair, for example, located in Florida State Prison was notorious for malfunctioning in its final years. Specific cases are as follows:
Jesse Tafero (executed May 4, 1990 but was innocent; the latter will explain), Pedro Medina (executed March 25, 1997), and Allen Lee Davis (executed July 7, 1999).
After their heads were engulfed with flames, questions were raised if such
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The death penalty is a very complicated and controversial issue. Some people argue that it is cruel and unethical; s... read more
Very few people on either side of the debate over the death penalty consider the practical or realistic aspects of th... read more
Assessing the death penalty "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a hand for a hand, a foot for a foot" In thi... read more
I can say unequivocally that capital punishment has a deterrent effect but only in one specific way: The person ex... read more
by Themis Libra
In many countries they have capital punishment as a legal decision towards people who commit murder, genocide, and so... read more
View All Articles on:
Assessing the death penalty
Add your voice
Know something about Assessing the death penalty?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Charity Music is a nonprofit public service organization that loans musical instruments free of charge to individua...more
hide