There are 38 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #12 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| No | 36% | 130 votes | Total: 358 votes | |
| Yes | 64% | 228 votes |
We can absolutely separate science from ideology. The matter becomes much simpler once I tear down the stumbling block that confuses the issue: science' is not by any means homogeneous. From economics to psychology to physics to library science, there is an infinite range of study that can be defined as science. I can grant that some areas are forever entwined with ideology: An experimental physicist may work only from the knowledge and concepts that is to say, the ideology lavished upon her by years of schoolwork and tutelage from an expert. Later, her work will add to that ideology for future generations. An economist working on a new model for taxation is still concerned with the ideology of education, but he is further driven by an ideology not quite peculiar to economics money.
My argument seems to have come full circle; if education and finance both constitute ideologies, how can any science, which requires much of both, be separate? My proposal is this: there are two situations where science separates from ideology. Firstly, the most fundamental of the sciences are largely separated from ideology. That is, in mathematics and theoretical physics, a scientist must sometimes separate himself from previous conceptions in order to allow new possibilities. This in turn could be defined as an ideology but allowing for that quickly creates a nomenclature trap in which anything can be an ideology, which would mean nothing could ever be separate from ideology. The other situation occurs in every branch of science, whether fundamental or applied: breakthroughs must necessarily be independent of the ideologies of the field. To truly push a science forward, a scientist needs the gifts of intuition and imagination as well as the ability to put on hold deeply held convictions. The very fact that we have democracy, refrigerators, and equations describing curved space-time gives proof that, at least for brief moments, science has taken a break from ideology.
Learn more about this author, Craig Lawrie.
Click here to send author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Aubrey Chen
Pure science and pure ideology are two very separate, yet overlapping, entities. Neither one exists in the world - sc...read more
by Doc Meson
Yes, we can seperate science from ideology. An ideology is a collection of ideas. From this definition, using it s...read more
by V R Rutledge
When science was in its infancy, ideology was thousands of years old. Science was supposed to be the opposite of ide...read more
by Briar Shaw
We tend to assume that science is different to ideology, that it is more real or valid, because it deals in physical ...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Can we separate science from ideology??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
National Autism Association (NAA)
The National Autism Association (NAA) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to donate your article earning...more
hide