17 of 17

Yes

Write now Article Tools

Whites and Asians, because of their background, are unfairly favored in the SAT. Rich people are able to get their children tutored, and this unfairly increases their scores. The SAT has become more representative of one's ability to study for the SAT rather than its intended purpose.

The SAT is infamous for being biased. A classic example of this is the oarsman-regatta analogy. Students taking the SAT were asked to find the pair most similar to runner and marathon. Those of poorer ancestry were not as familiar with regattas, and their scoring percentage on that question was less than half of that of wealthy whites. Studies have show that there was a gap of up to 500 points between average scores depending on income and demographics with those of Caucasian or Asian ancestry scoring highest. Also note that this discrepancy was recorded using data for the older SATs; 500 points was a much greater gap back then.

The addition of the essay section affords more room for criticism. One professor was able to guess the grade within 50 points at least 90% of the time. When he inserted the word 'chimpanzee' randomly into the essay, the grade was boosted dramatically.

With such a biased and genuinely worthless test, it's no wonder top colleges are taking in more and more students that do not meet standards.

Learn more about this author, Dakota Killpack.
Click here to send author comments or questions.

Add your voice

Know something about Should the SAT be abolished for college admissions decisions??
We want to hear your view. Write now!